SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : USWeb (USWB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick who wrote (925)5/19/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: Racso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1188
 
RE: Insider sales at USWB

-As of April, M Kvamme, T Corey, T Suiter, J Firmage and S Laube were holding together 4.023mm or 5.4% of shares outstanding. Quite a respectable amount by any measure. This amount does not include shares held by R Shaw [CE0] nor C Ayer [CFO].
-Since you claim to have a long investing experience, you should have learn by now that insider sales per se have no meaning for investing purposes. You should know this.
-Since such type of sales may nevertheless be a cause of concern, let us be clear that in USWB's case the highest insider sales activity took place back in November [$97mm] with the lowest amount this March [$81mm]. Insider sales in the last 30 days is $18mm.
-Most important to understand USWB in this regard is the fact that institutional ownership is growing. Bloomberg quotes 135 buyers in the last reporting period which comprises 105 buyers and only 39 sellers. M Stanley in its last report quotes 153 institutional investors. All together these institutions own 49.4% of shares. Again quite respectable.



To: Rick who wrote (925)5/19/1999 6:11:00 PM
From: George Dvorsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1188
 
RE: "you can never know or be sure of the actual positions, profits, or losses that individual posters have in their portfolio or individual positions."

I assumed that what you wrote you had, you had. And when you said it was a good short you meant it. Isn't that enough to "be sure" about what YOU have or you mean?

gd