SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yacht Trash who wrote (4501)5/19/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: jakdog  Respond to of 11568
 
in local quotes, BE has said he did not like stock splits just to run up stock prices. there must be a strategic corporate reason for issuing new stock. i believe the 100s was a ball park figure as a price where the smaller investor gets squeezed out. sidgemore & BE are movers but i like the glue in CFO SCOTT SULLIVAN WHO CAN CRUNCH NUMBERS BETTER THAN ANYONE. he not only has been able to manage the financial end of all these mergers and acquisitions, he has done in with such little pain to stock holders. somehow they are able to get there numbers right instead of hyping one another.



To: Yacht Trash who wrote (4501)5/19/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: JPhilipS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11568
 
My question was in response to something I'd seen here earlier in the week. I was trying to find out if it had any validity. I'd also seen the 100-target theory several times. Just curious.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News