SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (59024)5/20/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583348
 
Kash - <The only problem I have is with the wafer cost of $3,250 per wafer.>

I don't agree with all of his numbers either, but in general his arguments are sound.

<Sure hope the consumers want high end chips rather than lower end chips.>

The reports that higher end demand will vanish are premature at this point, IMHO. Of course, this scenario would hurt both companies until one or both readjusted their business plans. I, as an intellabee, am sure glad Intel has the Xeon line as somewhat of a hedge against the unthinkable above. You are talking about the PIII market segment going away, right?

PB




To: kash johal who wrote (59024)5/20/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: d e conway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583348
 
Kash...

<< .18 micron fabs running next year...HUGE volumes of celerys >>

Big worry for Intel...what do they do with all that capacity? Oversupply kills the golden goose. Of course, also there can be no price relief for AMD.

regards, Dan



To: kash johal who wrote (59024)5/20/1999 8:45:00 PM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583348
 
It scares me that Intel will have 4 0 .18 micron fabs running next year. With Celeron die sizes of 80mm2 that translates to HUGE volumes of celerys.

Sure hope the consumers want high end chips rather than lower end chips.

Otherwise sayonara to higher stock prices to both Intel and AMD.


Yep, there's a real possibility of a bloodbath. AMD should put the Dresden fab on hold, but I'm sure they won't.

It's going to get ugly.



To: kash johal who wrote (59024)5/20/1999 11:25:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583348
 
Kash - Re: "It scares me that Intel will have 4 0 .18 micron fabs running next year. "

Intel is currently ramping up 3 (THREE) 0.18 micron fabs - D1B (Oregon), Fab 12 (Chandler) and Fab 18 - Israel - brand new & 0.18 micron from the ground up !

Paul