SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (57627)5/20/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
No, you're confusing me with Bezos.

>It appears that you are unable to comprehend what a business model is all about.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (57627)5/20/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: Gary Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
AMAZON supporters are like the builder of the Titanic who said she can't be sunk.

Just because you've made money in this "Thing" don't think for one second that you understand business any better than or that you're smarter than the next person.

There are plenty of competitors to go around and when the panic really ensues nobody will stop it. Commodity businesses are the toughest to make money as is demonstrated by Amazon's track record.

Eventually the market rookies will learn what it takes to stay in business and it ain't glitz at conferences or speculative fever, it's profits pure and clear.

Let's not confuse blind luck with understanding of business basics here. You and William have no some special insight into business. I maintain that you are lucky, pure and simple. You've been the "victim" of an unprecedented speculative wave that's way out front from reality.

Say that you've made lots of money because you understand the Psychology of investing better than the rest of us. Heck, say you're lucky and I'm happy for your success, but skip the stale "you don't get the new business model" crap.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (57627)5/21/1999 8:36:00 AM
From: Robert Rose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<Now some people can become successful without a business plan (Monica Lewinski and Kato Kaelin come to mind) >

I'm rolling on the floor....LOL!



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (57627)5/21/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
We have told you time and time again that the amazon model depends on low margin
commodity goods where incremental price reductions can squeeze the competition out of
business.


Amazon can no longer reduce costs based on economy of scale. So let's remove that argument.

It appears
that you are unable to comprehend what a business model is all about. Now some people
can become successful without a business plan (Monica Lewinski and Kato Kaelin come
to mind) but it is more elusive thats for sure.


Michelle,

Amazon has no business model. They are flying by the seat of their pants and every odd ball move proves that. If were not for MS, they would be history a long time ago.

Glenn



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (57627)5/21/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
Price: $137 5/8
Estimates (Dec) 1998A 1999E 2000E
EPS: d$0.50 d$1.74 d$1.85
P/E: NM NM NM
EPS Change (YoY): NM NM
Consensus EPS: d$1.70 d$1.27
(First Call: 12-May-1999)
Q2 EPS (Jun): d$0.12 d$0.52
Cash Flow/Share: NA NA NA
Price/Cash Flow: NM NM NM
Dividend Rate: Nil Nil Nil
Dividend Yield: Nil Nil Nil
Opinion & Financial Data
Investment Opinion: D-2-1-9
Mkt. Value / Shares Outstanding (mn): $21,607.1 / 157
Book Value/Share (Dec-1998): $0.49
Price/Book Ratio: 280.9x
Stock Data
52-Week Range: $221 1/4-$13 5/16
Symbol / Exchange: AMZN / OTC
Options: Phila
Institutional Ownership-Spectrum: 36.2%
Brokers Covering (First Call): 22
ML Industry Weightings & Ratings**
Strategy; Weighting Rel. to Mkt.:
Income: Underweight (07-Mar-1995)
Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
Income & Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
Capital Appreciation: In Line (28-Jan-1999)
Market Analysis; Technical Rating: Average (27-Apr-1999)
*Intermediate term opinion last changed on 09-Mar-1999.
**The views expressed are those of the macro department and do not
necessarily coincide with those of the Fundamental analyst.
For full investment opinion definitions, see footnotes.
Investment Highlights:
* On May 17, Amazon.com announced that it will
begin selling New York Times bestsellers at a 50%
discount, instead of its usual 20%-40% off. We
believe that this move has several implications for
the company, stock, and industry.
* Namely, we believe the move is:
1. positive for the long-term value of Amazon.com-the-
company (we do not believe that the cut will
have a major effect on the growth of
Amazon.com's gross profit, especially over the
long term),
2. possibly negative for the near-term performance
of AMZN-the-stock (the perception of a possible
price war is rarely positive for stock prices,
especially in an industry in which the fear is that
margins will go to zero), and,
3. negative for competitors, both on and offline
(Amazon.com now has the wealth, scale, and
ambition to seriously undermine the
competition—and appears willing to use it).
* We believe that Amazon.com's shareholder base is
still in transition, with a group of investors moving
out of the stock as a result of the company's
slowing revenue growth. Aside from the typical
end-of-quarter run and possible new product or
investment announcements, we don't know of any
catalysts likely to drive the stock higher near-term.
We think it should be still a core holding in our
long-term internet portfolio, however.
Comment
United States
Internet \ Electronic Commerce
18 May 1999
Henry Blodget
First Vice President Amazon.com
Implications of Price Cut ACCUMULATE*
Long Term
BUY Reason for Report: Company Announcement
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Global Securities Research & Economics Group
Global Fundamental Equity Research Department
RC#20113828
Stock Performance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
1996 1997 1998 1999
Amazon.com
Rel to S&P Composite Index (500) (Right Scale)