Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rhr who wrote (17470)	5/21/1999 10:03:00 PM
From: J. Williams	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22810

Rhr, You have made reasonable arguement on DR. M's behalf and you do so with respect and dignity. For that I thank you. Honest respectful discourse is in much demand on this thread. I should say that when outrageous predictions of $3.00 prices by such and such a date were made, I took them as irresponsible and wreckless. When DR. M. was asked to share the basis of the prediction only psycho-babble about other bashers was the response. Dr. M has been asked numerous times, respectfully, to share any info, there is no response. So what is one to conclude; That this is just a hypster trying to pump, whether the dump ensues is no bother to me as I have been a stockholder for nearly three years and now have a position of over 300,000 shares. Not much by some standards but a sizeable position in any case. If you want to know what DD has been done and by whom then you should review the DD that was done from 10/96 through 12/97 on the original NPEC thread. Sir there was DD done in that time period that even surprised some folks in the company. Especially by the infamous basher Jim Nelson. Probably one of the premier researchers at that time. But most of the folks here now weren't around then and have no concept of the rather (to put it mildly) lackluster track record of promises made and promises broken when it comes to news and financial reporting from the company. Us oldtimers are weary of those promises even today as the outlook is much more rosey. Perhaps when this thing breaks $.50 there will be more believers. Based on the DD done long ago I have stuck it out till this time. Regardless of my negative perception of managements motives I am confident that these people were not acting fraudulently. That has added to my patience. You asked why I and others attack the messenger rather than the message. Most of the message from DR. M has its root in info garnered directly from Company people. The Last place I would look for validating information is the Company. I take the company info with a grain of salt and then try to validate it through outside sources. When I get that validation then I have posted and will post my findings for everyone else to peruse. DR. M cannot and will not do others here the courtesy of cutting and pasting the info as part of the post but insists on using hotlinks. Doing that breaks the flow of info and makes you read through needless info to get to the meat. When Dr Meade starts giving substantiation to the predictions made and stops bashing the bashers him/herself, because it only adds fuel to the fire, then I will see my way clear to back off, it is up to the DR. ciao. JWMS Sorry for the length but I had to try to answer you honestly.