To: Clarence Dodge who wrote (7584 ) 5/23/1999 11:51:00 PM From: Spots Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
>>As usual i have complications I refer you to Thoreau: Simplify, simplify. >>. I'm interested in not cloning C: but making scheduled mirrors of it using something like ... Good luck. In general you have to shut down a system to mirror it successfully. Maybe you can figure a way around this. If you do, clue me in. I haven't so far, but I keep trying. >>As usual i have complications No. Really? Ya sure? >>My C: holds TA program folders referencing data on the scsi drive Not a problem in itself. These references are probably the safest of the lot unless you do something to make NT believe the SCSI drive letter is different from whatever your program references think it is. >>I think of my primary NT install on C: to also include the partition on the scsi Very dangerous thinking, since it's not true. Get out of denial and face the reality that NT doesn't give a rat's ass how you think about it. >>I know thats not possible, but ... A glimmer of hope, here, but only a glimmer<G>. >>thats how I conceptualize these two drives as a unit. Yeah, the Mac background showing through from the arty crowd, sounds like <ggg>. Concept transcends earthly reality, etc. Didn't work on the Mac either, I'll bet. Nothing like a finite state automaton to bring even the most arty conceptualizer down to earth sooner or later, in between renderings, of course <GGG>. >>As far as mirroring the two as a pair into D: am I looking at another nitemare as far as management goes? Nope, not a nightmare. A pipe dream. BFM, which is a technical term meaning roughly "exercise of dark occult arts." I paraphrase slightly owing to the fact that posts from this thread may occasionally appear in search engines run from family web sites. >>To be continued... Himmel helfen die beide uns ...