Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COM21 (CMTO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (417)	5/25/1999 1:04:00 AM
From: pat mudge	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2347

Could this be weighing on the stock? <<< May 24, 1999 18:58 Internet firms urge FCC to ensure cable open access By Aaron Pressman WASHINGTON, May 24 (Reuters) - America Online , MCI WorldCom Inc. and other Internet companies again urged federal authorities to bar cable operators from striking exclusive deals on new high-speed Internet service offerings, participants in closed-door talks said on Monday. Internet providers want to be sure that consumers will enjoy the same open access to their services via cable networks that they now have over phone lines, and not have to "pay twice" the way some cable operators want them to. Federal Communications Commission staff heard detailed pitches from the Internet companies along with responses from cable operators, who oppose any new regulations. The meeting was to continue on Tuesday as part of an "informal, educational" session on the convergence of the cable and Internet industries, attendees said. The FCC has twice turned aside Internet companies' pleas on cable Internet services, but AT&T Corp.'s planned acquisition of MediaOne Group Inc. , the long distance giant's second major cable purchase, has renewed the interest of regulators and lawmakers in Congress as well. Under current law and FCC rules, phone companies offering high or low speed Internet access must offer customers a choice of Internet service providers -- companies that provide features like e-mail and Web page hosting. But the same rules do not apply to cable operators. AT&T, for example, requires customers of high-speed cable Internet access to purchase the services of AtHome Corp. , a cable-owned provider controlled by AT&T, for a single price. Cable Internet customers may also reach AOL or other providers, but still must pay for the cable operator's provider. Internet companies argue that by, in effect, forcing customers to pay twice to reach them, the cable companies are stifling competition and could potentially exercise undue control over Internet content. MCI WorldCom chief policy counsel Jonathan Sallet said the FCC ought to make open access to cable Internet service a prerequisite to approving AT&T's merger with MediaOne. "We believe open access to the nation's cable systems will guarantee that consumers can use the Internet any way they choose," Sallet said. Cable companies say the FCC has no authority to interfere, and that the exclusive deals are needed to pay for the expensive upgrades necessary to allow Internet service to be offered over cable wires. AT&T spokesman Jim McGann said MCI and others "happen to be wrong." McGann said AT&T was acquiring cable companies primarily to compete in the local telephone market against the regional Bell companies. On the open access issue, McGann said: "The FCC has looked at it. They said they will monitor it and that's the appropriate role for the government at this point." Last week, FCC chairman William Kennard asserted that his agency had authority to require cable operators to change their practices. But Kennard said he had not heard a good suggestion for how open access rules could be crafted without creating excessive regulation. In addition to MCI, AT&T and AOL, other companies expected to speak at the two-day meeting included Cox Communications Inc. , Bell Atlantic Corp. and the Commercial Internet Exchange. FCC officials attending included top staff from the agency's cable and common carrier bureaus. FCC officials had little comment Monday on the meetings but said a statement might be issued on Tuesday >>>>

To: lml who wrote (417)	5/25/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: OverSold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2347

Not Necessarily True, As prices for DSL are expected to come down as of course demand increases. DSL was seen as a threat sooner than later in the SOHO and Personal user markets. There are benefits over Cable. I for one have my own personal ADSL line through Bellsouth. Benefits, Designated line, no squeeze on Bandwidth, less down time. My speed is faster than Cable at 1.250 mbps and will not decrease. Bandwidth on cable has not been tested by large data traffic as of yet, it is well know that this will slow data transmission on Cable Lines. I tried the @Home service at my local Comp USA and my line is faster. Also, there is new technology for ADSL, DSL, SDSL etc. that cuts way down on the hardware required to get this service up and running, hence $$$ savings to all providers = market penetration = more home users. As more people get on Cable so goes the bandwidth. AOL is also looking at DSL,this is a HUGE consumer market RIGHT. These regulatory factors will increase cost burden on DSL providers and slow the whole process down for DSL. So yes................ this does help CMTO. Good Luck to ALL!