Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLCO Internet collectables, childrens toys...etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (445)	5/25/1999 12:43:00 AM
From: chalu2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1296

I'm still not sure what difference all this interlocking ownership makes; but it might make some--all I can find so far is an apparent undervaluation of UTTC. I'll take a look at MMCI tomorrow, with the same issue in mind.

To: Rande Is who wrote (445)	5/25/1999 9:05:00 AM
From: Triffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1296

Rande Is .. < how can all this be true ?? > It goes a long way towards explaining the price discrepency between the PLCO / PLCOP as none of the large PLCO longs will loan their stock .. I've called them .. Jim in CT ..

To: Rande Is who wrote (445)	6/2/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: kbert	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1296

Rande, I have a problem with Breaking Waves claiming %25 of PLCO If I read the last filled statement of ownership from www.freeedgar.com, I see: They claim to have 1,400,000 shares of common stock .... which is supposed to be approximately 25.4% of the outstanding shares???? HOW CAN THAT BE ??? I thought number of common outstanding shares was much bigger IF WE TAKE PREFERRED INTO ACCOUNT What do you think ? Seems to me that PLCO is flying on its own and these guys don't control its future as much as they would like to. Which I think is good for PLCO. :) Archie