SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (2724)5/25/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17683
 
I've been watching your running gun battle over China, and have to throw in my 2c.

The Chinese have stated categorically that they did not STEAL any secrets about our nukes or any other high tech stuff, and I believe them completely -- they BOUGHT those secrets, and probably have the bills of sale to prove it. They paid good money to this administration and its friends in the industrial world (Loral in particular) for everything they got.

I surely don't blame the Chinese for wanting to get our secrets, any more than I'd blame AMD for trying to get the print of Intel's latest processor. But, I have lots of venom for the traitor in the White House who allowed, if not encouraged, this transfer of technology; IMO, he deserves at least what the Rosenbergs got.

jim



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (2724)5/26/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 17683
 
Mary,
How do you like the way Red China firmly denies spying on any US weapons? Sheesh, no wonder Clinton was close friends with certain people!
Longer term, I agree that friendship with China is the best course to take, but for now, there are many serious questions and concerns being raised.
By the way, I do believe that the attack on the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was deliberate, as it was a "get even" ploy by the west for all the spying and China's opposition to the NATO terrorism being committed by the so-called "good guys". Yogi