To: MikeM54321 who wrote (3890 ) 5/26/1999 8:45:00 AM From: Frank A. Coluccio Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
Mike, Thread... This is an OT Post on Y2K Preparedness I obtained this from the NANOG list, ( the North American Network Operators Group). It concerns the Securities Industry Association's (SIA's) Y2K Contingency plan. Aside from the url, which points to the actual plan model, you might find some of the poster's observations below both informative, and amusing, depending on your perspective. I would hope that you find it both interesting and useful. Just a word about the actual file for you folks who are operating without the benefit of an office LAN operating at super high speeds, or, like myself, who have not yet been graced with DSL or cable modem. It's in pdf format, and runs about 2MB deep. Also, bracketed terms such as "[xyz]" are mine, to protect the innocent. Regards, Frank Coluccio --------------------From NANOG: [ xyz] = mine, to protect the innocent. "If you would like to see what a contingency plan looks like, the Securities Industry Association released its industry Y2K contingency plan yesterday.sia.com "The SIA tends to refer to the Internet as the "web." How many network planning folks were aware one alternative for maintaining market operations is using the web to post prices? I'm glad the financial industry has such confidence in our ability to continue to deliver service even if other communication systems fail. "Also after the NANOG meeting [we] received a few additional comments on [our] presentation. I would like to clarify a few things. 1) [We]I did not mean to imply that [our organization] has completed all of its Y2K preparations. See Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure Statement. 2) The US Government is (at least one US Senator has strongly suggested it, so it seems pretty likely it will be done) setting up a Y2K network which is independent of the normal telephone network (satellite, HF radio, and other government communication assets) including electric grid controllers and 'major' telephone company management centers. However, at the current time no ISP NOC has asked or been asked to participate. Even at those companies which have both a voice NMCC and an ISP NOC, the ISP part of the company has generally been left out. [We] covered some of the reasons in my talk (although perhaps a bit obliquely). 3) [We're] not recommending using the FCC 'emergency' rule to attempt ISP NOC communication. I think even the hams would agree, without training and experience such ad hoc radio networks tend to quickly become unusable. And no, [we] don't think having a ham license is sufficient (or necessary) experience. [We'd] rather teach 10 law firm receptionists how to use a radio if I want to be sure the message will be delivered to the correct person without being garbled, for many of the same reasons you don't hire your typical telephone engineer as a telephone receptionist." --