Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Source Media SRCM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MW who wrote (2547)	5/26/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: David Penfield	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3015

mw - The only 13F for Berkshire that I could find was at: edgar-online.com and that did not mention the alleged investment in SRCM. If BRK did in fact file a 13F detailing an investment in SRCM then where is the URL? This is isn't worth arguing about - either you can produce a URL to back up your claim, in which case I'll believe you. Or you can't produce a URL, in which case I'll treat your claim as rumor.

To: MW who wrote (2547)	5/26/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: CMon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3015

To jump in: It depends on what you mean by "Berkshire Hathaway bought shares" I wouldn't doubt that General Re, and therefore one could argue Bershire, holds some shares in this along with a few thousand other securities. It's an insurance firm. It has vast portfolio holdings. But if your thought is to imply that The Great One has ever heard of SRCM, than you've either been deluded, are deluding yourself, or are attempting to delude others.

To: MW who wrote (2547)	5/26/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3015

Okay, SLIGHT difference there. This is what MW has been crowing about: freedgar.com A holding by a subsidiary of a company which was in turn bought by Berkshire is decidedly NOT the same thing as Mr. Buffett taking SRCM into his inner circle of long-term holdings. Misleading as usual, MW.