SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (59728)5/26/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572099
 
Kash - RE: "Shame if they have a killer CPU but no software that can un on it."

Yeah, AMD doesn't want to copy Intel's release of the PIII!!! ;)

"The SPEC marks however should be quite stunning looking at the diskmark scores."

Certain people have speculated that at the same clock speed and outfitted w/the same speed/size L2 cache, the K7 will easily surpass the Xeon's SpecFp95 score.



To: kash johal who wrote (59728)5/26/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572099
 
kash, Re: Also getting the L2 cache up to 1/2 speed seems critical to me.

Do you think even Intel seems to be hitting this problem about
L2 cache ?

Gary



To: kash johal who wrote (59728)5/27/1999 2:15:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1572099
 
Kash - Re: "I think Paul Engel had posted that the CPU power was in the 60 Watt range. I think his sources were pretty good on that one."

Thank you.

Remember how Scumbria dismissed that 60 watt estimate as way too high?

Paul



To: kash johal who wrote (59728)5/27/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572099
 
Kash,

Well there are a couple of things you should know about that unit. That was not a production BIOS.. that alone can (and have been told did) have a termendous impact on performance.

Secondly that was only a 1/3 speed cache unit, which as you point out will make a big difference. Also there is good reason to believe that some features of the FPU on that model were disabled/had workarounds on them which significantly affected the performance.

Regards,

Steve