SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (59751)5/27/1999 1:51:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572460
 
Re: "The argument that they have a late model piece of silicon is worthless. One bad gate can make a CPU unstable. "

Of course one bad gate can make it unstable, that's the point. Scumbria, what they said was:

"the K7 we have is a very recent build, and according to our sources, is as close to release as AMD will be able to accomplish by June. "

You keep digging deeper and deeper to come up with excuses for the embarrassing benchmarks, but if the claims of "the firing squad" are correct, what you see is what you get. Perhaps AMD should admit the K7 isn't ready for prime time and delay it a few months. Of course that will bring it headon with Coppermine but you shouldn't mind that because the K7 is "the fastest processor in the universe" right?

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (59751)5/27/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572460
 
SCUMbria - Re: "The argument that they have a late model piece of silicon is worthless. One bad gate can make a CPU unstable. "

Funny - the Firing Squad never mentioned a K7 stability problem.

Are you implying AMD cannot properly test their K7 for full functionality of all internal logic?

I'll bet AMD's customers feel REALLY GOOD about that.

Paul