Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Sepracor-Looks very promising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RCMac who wrote (3061)	5/27/1999 11:56:00 AM
From: BMcV	Respond to of 10280

>>This is a long way from serious financial "journalism."<< Yes, but unfortunately typical of the profession currently. Kids are writing articles, nobody is checking their sources, nobody thinks to mention potential or existing biases, and everyone is looking for sensations. This was less a SEPR story than a "personality" story (ie, the fund manager's) so the normal procedures of calling SEPR IR for a comment go by the board.

To: RCMac who wrote (3061)	5/27/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10280

<This suggests (1) that Greenberg, if he wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, should do his homework better> I've been amazed at how many people give a s**t what street.com says ever since I saw Cramer on T.V. blustering away without a clue what he was talking about. These people are all "wana-bees" IMO, trying to create news where there may be none by accepting whatever "research" [cough] puff article that lands on their desk. Where Goldman, Morgan, Merril etc are busy talking to Bloomberg, these people will talk to anyone in their effort to be the "rad outsider" Wall Street hip gurus. DAK