Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PCSS who wrote (62217)	5/28/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Michael.... Ben Rosen is beginning to look lame from where I sit here in front of my computer screen. If he doesn't get it in gear and come with something positive soon, CPQ will see a new 52 week low soon, imho. I don't know that it will be the teens, but 20-21 surely is possible. El

To: PCSS who wrote (62217)	5/28/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Michael... if Ben Rosen were "GREAT" he would have stepped in last year during the first round of channel stuffing/EM lies and maybe CPQ wouldn't be in the mess that it's in right now. So he was 25 dollars per share late in firing two losers, what has he done that's so great??? Can ya tell I'm disgusted with the way things are going??? El

To: PCSS who wrote (62217)	5/29/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

>>>So ......... 2X or 3X is a given !!<<< Maybe I'm missing something here, but I just don't understand your thinking. Nothing is a "given" in the stock market, especially with a proven loser like CPQ. Why is no one buying this stock if it is a guaranteed double or triple bagger over the next 12-18 months? This stock is dead in the water. El