Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Ashton Technology (ASTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (1427)	5/29/1999 9:54:00 AM
From: mst2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4443

I'm still puzzled - ATG used First United as its underwriter, and they were certainly a sleazy bunch. In the meantime, even the first shares I bought through First United are now profitable, and those guys folded their tent over a year ago. What exactly are you trying to say? Guilt by association? If First United brought them public, something must be wrong 3 years later? If you look at the beginnings of this message board, you will see people saying that ATG was a complete fraud 3 years ago, that they would never get an SEC approval, that it was pure pump and dump (which clealry and unequivocally it is not). If it were a P & D there would never have been an SEC approval over VTS, etc. Rittereiser himself is on record saying very negative things about First United. So I return to my original question - what exactly is the implication? PS - 27 trading days over 6.75 today. MST