Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WISDOM MILES who wrote (16589)	5/30/1999 12:51:00 PM
From: Patrick J. Sugrue	Respond to of 19331

WM, Thanks for posting the link. As I read it we have good, bad and so-so indicators. IMO it just gets down to how much one trusts the main man in charge. People will SELL if the don't, BUY or stay the course if they do. Remember the Vets! Pat in Austin

To: WISDOM MILES who wrote (16589)	5/30/1999 12:58:00 PM
From: Laserbones	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19331

VectorVest analysis is meaningless. The weight of the relative timing indicator far exceeds all other considerations in the analysis. VectorVest is merely reactive to a stocks movement. It never predicts anything and its assignment of value to a stock is highly dubious. Consider that if a stock makes gains 2 consecutive days the recommendation will be to "Buy". If the same stock then has two days of selling pressure, Vector will switch its recommendation to "Sell" or possibly a "Hold". Vector merely makes recommendations after the fact. The funny thing is that a stock can have all "Greens" down the list and still have a "Sell" recommendation due to the weighting of the Relative Timing. I've seen Vector Vest give a "Sell" on stocks that it also predicts will give extremely consistent, well above average returns, etc. Read a VectorVest analysis on DCTC for entertainment purposes only. GMH