Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Syncrude who wrote (9934)	6/1/1999 10:35:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 10836

Idiots and weasels. I love SI. Can't you people show each other less respect? What is this tippy-toeing around stuff? I was beginning to think this place was some kind of country club. Thanks for the update. I think KRY paid too high a price for the MAEL asset. Owing was only a modest maintenance fee, not a stiff tranche. The value remains, after all, to be seen. It appears to be a lost cause. As far as Chavez goes, it would appear there is no more pliant laissez-faire palm than a socialist palm. Money is money, damn the rhetoric. EC<:-}

To: Syncrude who wrote (9934)	6/2/1999 9:07:00 PM
From: charred	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Okay mr, Syncrude, 1.4 million CDN, so what. I don't live in Canada therefore I think in $US. Big deal. The point is they made 0.04 earning per share or 0.02 earning per share. To do this they now have 23 million in long term debt and decreased their cash significantly. Do you think they spent a lot of general expenses? Again what do you think of the conflict of interest with the management and Stay Management? I told you what a good deal for Mael is, no payments until the KRY has the right to mine. Not one dollar. Again you won't answer these questions because they are difficult. If you answered them honestly, you would be selling the stock tomorrow. Therefore answer the damn questions. If you don't, you already did.