Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (50583)	5/31/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Wait just a second here..... << A soldier in war, self defense, etc. Aborting a pregnancy to save the life of a mother >> ok this remains consistent with the taking of what you consider another life.But....<< in a case of rape or incest >> No,no,no,no this is in no way consistent.Not self defense. Not to save a life. Not the same at all.If the fetus is human no way can you justify killing it because incest, rape.... Tell me is this so called human responsible for the rape,incest? If not why the capitol punishment? How would you explain killing a newborn child because the mother was raped ? No,no,no you know damn well you couldn't do that. Yet you say that a fetus is a child I hear this over and over.In fact this is the only argument against abortion. If so how can you justify abortion in this instance but not in other instances that you say are some how not justified.....explain please. You have not made the argument to support the concept of no abortions because the fetus is a human. So you see even if I were to accept your premise that a fetus is a child [which of course I don't] this is still about control pez