SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (10691)5/31/1999 12:58:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
"We, the US and the other post-WWII democracies, created the UN as a means to preserve and promote the concept of democracy and freedom."

Very humorous!

The UN was created to solidify and institutionalize the Anglo-Jewish-American hegemony over the world. We stopped Hitler from conquering the world because he was simply interfering with our plans.
Isn't it strange that we set out to make the world safe for democracy and ended up with PAX AMERICANAN-ANGLORIUM-JUDAICA.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (10691)5/31/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 17770
 
Hi there!

Ron, I'm still investigating... This morning (Brussels time), I stumbled on an article that mentioned (Colonel) Alain Le Carro, former Security Manager of French President F. Mitterrand. Now, the guy's allegedly launched his own security outfit but it's possible that he's been involved in Eastern Africa --too bad I lost the link to that article... Anyway, here's the latest:

(I corrected the spelling)

International Viewpoint * Inprecor * Inprekorr
Address: PECI, BP85, 75522 Paris cedex 11, France.
Fax +33-01 43 79 29 61 <10066.1443@compuserve.com>

Free electronic subscription available on request

____________________________________________________________
CRAP in action

Eric Toussaint


The westward advance of the rebel forces has encouraged many opponents of Zaire's Mobutu regime. France, the USA and Belgium, the main imperialist powers controlling this region, so rich in strategic raw materials, are increasingly worried. They are trying, in vain, to impose some kind of Mobutuism without Mobutu.

The capitalist powers can't agree on how to keep Zaire within the fold. France wants an aggressive, active policy, reinforcing her role as prime power in the region. Belgium is desperate not to lose her remaining influence in her former colonies. The United States want to consolidate their influence in Uganda and Rwanda, and make new friends in Zaire.

But the size of the disaster seems to be forcing the three neo-colonial powers into a temporary alliance to protect their interests. The pretext, of course, is humanitarianism: coming quickly to the aid of those Rwandan refugees who have not yet begun the trek home. The second pretext is avoiding a de-stabilisation of all of central Africa.

What form will the intervention take? For the moment, under-the-table support for the Mobutu regime, enabling it to gain military control over the eastern regions of Zaire. The Belgian and US governments are hesitant, but they are allowing France to forge ahead.

An international military expedition under the auspices of the UN Security Council is unlikely, but not impossible. The goal of any such intervention would be to prevent the rebellion from spreading to the rest of Zaire.

Another option would be to pressure rebel leader Laurent Kabila to negotiate with the Zairian regime, with some kind of guarantees for the parliamentary elections which should take place later this year. This option would be hard to put into practice. What kind of compromise could be stitched together between the rotten regime in Kinshasa, the zig-zag opposition of Tschisekedi, and the armed rebellion of Laurent Kabila? In any case, progressives should oppose any pact of this type, which would only prolong the life of the dictatorship, and the suffering of the Zairian people.

Blood on Parisian hands

France fully supports the Mobutu regime. The dictator's second home is on the Cote d'Azur, and France enables him to shuttle between Zaire, Morocco and Europe to mobilize support for his crumbling regime. Despite an official embargo, France continues to arm the regime in Kinshasa, training the officers and torturers of the Zairian armed
forces.

There are even French troops among the mercenary force led, on paper, by the Belgian adventurer Christian Tavernier. According to Colonel Yamba, who defected from the Zairian army after active service in the Eastern provinces during the 1980s, "what you call mercenaries are actually 500 French soldiers from Bangui [one of France's main permanent bases in the region]. According to journalist Colette Braeckman, "the elite CRAP (Deep Search and Action) unit,(1) was trained at Kota Koli, a Zaire army training camp set up by Belgian officers, and now operates from a base in Kisangani".

The mercenary Tavernier is just a cover. According to Billets d'Afrique newsletter "the General Staff of the mercenary force is 80% staffed by French instructors." And "In June 1996, Christian Tavernier visited the Elysee Palace [home to French President Jacques Chirac]. According to one French diplomat, 'given the links between Foccart [an Elysee advisor] and Bob Denard [France's most famous mercenary boss] it is inconceivable that Foccart would not have been at the least aware of Tavernier's contract. Since Denard is no longer operational since his disastrous [failed coup attempt] in Comoros, a Belgian took the lead, a position which Denard would otherwise have occupied."(2)

On January 8th the British daily The Times reported that the mercenaries included British subjects, and that the mercenaries were being led on the ground by Alain Le Carro, former head of the personal guard of French president Mitterrand. The Times estimated that 1,000 French troops and military advisors were involved. According to the January 27 issue of the Brussels daily Le Soir, many mercenaries have been recruited from former Yugoslavia.

In other words, the French president's office has had a hand in all the dirty work done in Central Africa these last few years; complicity in the genocide carried out by Rwanda's Habyarimana dictatorship, intervention to protect the butchers, La Gauche 22/96, 6 December 96, military intervention to support the Central African Republic dictator Ange Patasse, just as French President V. Giscard d'Estaing supported that country's infamous Emperor Bokassa, support for the Eyadema regime in Togo a long list.

Belgium, which put Mobutu in power thirty years ago after helping assassinate Patrice Lumumba, leader of the Congolese independence movement, has continued to pillage the mineral resources of Zaire. But political relations with the dictator in Kinshasa cooled in 1990, when the presidential guard massacred 200 students on the Lubumbaschi campus. In November 1996, Belgium tried to re-build her privileged
links with the dictatorship, realizing that France and the USA were overtaking the former colonial power! Belgium's Secretary of State, Reginald Moreels shook hands with Zaire's Prime Minister Kengo Wa Dondo in Kinshasa, on the same day as the local population demonstrated in support of opposition leader Tschisekedi, and while the revolt in Kivu was quickly spreading across the eastern part of Zaire.

"People's" China, a long-time supporter of the Mobutu regime, sent a military delegation to Kinshasa on January 8th.(3) Chinese military advisors are participating in the regime's offensive to re-conquer the eastern part of Zaire. As for Israel, Mobutu's other old friend, "40 just-retired Israeli soldiers have begun training the dictator's presidential guard"(4)

1. Comando de Recherche et Action en Profondeur. See Colette Braeckman, Le Dinosaure, Fayard 1991

2. Billets d'Afrique, February 1997.

3. Billets d'Afrique, February 1997.

4. Le Soir, 5 December 1996

Direct link:
uv.es

I think Ms. Colette Braeckman is a reliable source: she is the ''Congo guru'' of both the Belgian and French presses and she regularly writes for renowned French monthly Le Monde Diplomatique.
Notwithstanding, this article shows (again) the fierce kriegspiel that's going on in Central Africa between France and the US. If Ch. Tavernier was just a cover then, considering the ''sentimentalism'' mercenaries such as B. Denard experience about Africa, we might be pretty sure that B. Denard belonged to the ''Zairian safari''....

So, the final victory of US-sponsored Laurent Kabila was not only a bitter diplomatic pill for France --it was a personal fiasco for B. Denard as well. Hence the backlash bombings against the US in Eastern Africa. BTW, here's a brief geographic survey of the Comoro Islands:

humanoidsoftware.com

See how convenient it is to reach Nairobi and Dar es-Salaam? And then, on the way back, one can still blur the track further by jumping from one island to the other and make one's exit off Mayotte (the French island)....



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (10691)5/31/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
One more thing...

I was dead wrong about the toll breakdown: Kenya incurred the heaviest toll of fatalities (over 260) but anyway, it doesn't change the relevance of my argument. We still can assume that both bombings were designed to blast as much as possible. A bombing pattern that doesn't fit quite well the usual Islamic modus operandi.

Regarding Israel's tacit consent, I think the key here is terrorist Carlos. France alone would never have been able to trap Carlos in Sudan; on the other hand, as an Islamic country, Sudan would never hand over a brother Muslim terrorist to Israel! Hence the temporary joint venture between Israel and France --the latter providing Sudan with a diplomatically correct semblance.

Carlos is indeed a precious intelligence/counter-terrorism asset, especially for Israel since his track record includes so many Palestinian operations. Further, Carlos was allegedly involved in the Entebe (Uganda) hijacking during wich Israeli PM B. Netanyahu lost his elder brother Nathan Netanyahu.... It would be interesting to ask Carlos if he's been paid a few courtesy visits by Mossad people during his term. Well, Israeli spies working in the French judicial administration could also fit the bill. Besides, Carlos's been turned over to the French when France had a pro-Israeli executive: Premier Edouard Balladur, Budget Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, Finance Minister Edmond Alphandéry,... The bottom line is that such a fruitful cooperation to apprehend Carlos in 1994 henceforth opened a clear-blue-sky window for the French intelligence services to maneuver in East Africa. Which explains the mixed signals the Mossad sent to the CIA: first, the Israeli secret service relayed the rumors about imminent terrorist attacks against US interests in the region but then, on second thoughts, the Mossad dismissed the rumors as ''false alarm''. Got it? Such a twist toward the CIA was, afterthoughtwise, a very smart hint dropped on the US administration: the Israeli message was to make the US realize that, without the Mossad, US interests could be at risk in East Africa....
Remember that the bombings occured when Clinton was in the midst of the Monicagate.

Regards,

Gustave.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (10691)6/2/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
I like your suggestion that neutral, non-aligned nations be granted the permanent seats in the UN. That would do wonders for the organization.