SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H James Morris who wrote (59414)5/31/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
James,

The Barrons attack is the strongest so far. If it holds up against this assault, my guess is this will be the Q2 low, except for a market crash. And as you know we did not crash last Friday. My other guess is this Friday will be nervous because of employment data. I wouldn't go out and play golf on that day, even if I was holding a ton of puts.

But you've noticed the pig is very anemic. Did it even move last week ? I think now eBay is the next fatted pig, and hopefully will run up and give the longs a chance to lend their shares at $30 or $40 Billion market cap.



To: H James Morris who wrote (59414)6/1/1999 8:14:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
FTC Staff to oppose Barnes & Noble buy of Ingram
By David Lawsky
WASHINGTON, May 31 (Reuters) - The staff of the Federal
Trade Commission will recommend to the full commission that it
reject bookseller Barnes & Noble Inc <BKS.N>.'s $600-million
bid to acquire book distributor Ingram Book Group, persons
close to the case said on Monday.
The FTC staff is already putting together a litigation team
that would go into court to challenge the vertical merger
between New York-based Barnes and Noble and privately-held
Ingram. The final decision will be up to the four members of
the commission.
Independent booksellers, many of whom purchase heavily from
Ingram, have opposed the merger, announced last November. Among
the ideas discussed between Barnes & Noble and the FTC staff to
temper their concerns was the possibility of having Ingram
assure stock on popular books to independent booksellers, which
the lawyers referred to as "access."
In addition, Ingram has extensive records about the
purchases of independent bookstores. A second idea was to
create a "firewall" to create confidentiality for independent
booksellers, so that Barnes & Noble could not learn what they
were doing.
But in the end the FTC staff decided to oppose the merger.
A close observer of the commission believed that the staff had
a good chance of being successful in selling the idea to the
commission.
"It would be a surprise if the commission doesn't go along
with this," said the observer.
If the full commission accepts the staff's recommendation
it would vote to halt the deal. Generally, the FTC has sought
court injunctions in cases where it believes mergers to be
illegal.
In addition to arguing that the independent booksellers
will be at a disadvantage from the proposed merger, the FTC
staff could also argue that Barnes & Noble's biggest rival --
Amazon.com <AMZN.O> -- faces unfair competition, a close
observer of the FTC said.

Nonetheless, a vertical competition case is highly unusual
and will pose a challenge in court. Earlier this year the
Justice Department successfully opposed the merger of Lockheed
Martin and Northrop Grumman in a vertical case, but that case
had many other elements as well.
A spokeswoman for Barnes & Noble declined to comment on
the staff recommendation.
"These are confidential proceedings and we're not going to
comment on speculation," said Mary Ellen Keating, a spokeswoman
for the firm. "We've worked closely (with the FTC) to answer
questions and provide information and these proceedings have
remained confidential."
A spokeswoman for the FTC had no comment.
Both the American Booksellers Association and the Author's
Guild have been loud in their opposition. In addition to
affidavits to the government there has been a publicity
campaign. Some independent bookstore owners around the country,
for example, have told their stories in local newspaper
articles, arguing that the public and the booksellers would
lose if the deal went through.
REUTERS
Rtr 23:48 05-31-99