Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (50683)	6/1/1999 12:31:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Look, If one believes that it is immoral to terminate a pregnancy and wants to force this belief system on others this is control. Compare this with the concept that the fetus is a human being. The law says that you don't deliberately take the life of an Innocent human ever. I think we can agree on that. Self defense is taking the life of some one who is trying to harm you or another thus not innocent. No other exceptions allowed.To talk about manslaughter is not relevant as you are talking about the perpetrator not the victim [fetus] .Unless you are saying that in case of rape /abortion society will charge the woman with manslaughter instead of murder. What I am saying is that if exceptions that are not self defense [womans health risks] are permitted then one is not affording the fetus the protections that are commonly given all humans. Thus one does not believe it to be human. This means that rule of law is not the basis of the argument. It's purpose is to bend others to the will of a belief system... control pez