Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grok who wrote (82267)	6/1/1999 1:43:00 AM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "Paul, if IBM has backed totally away from rambus then what will they use with Coppermine? " Huh? EP

To: grok who wrote (82267)	6/1/1999 2:12:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

KZNerd - Re: "Paul, if IBM has backed totally away from rambus then what will they use with Coppermine? It would seem that with their firm statement they would have a foolproof Coppermine with fast sdram ready, wouldn't hey?" Careful. As I recall, that IBM response FOR DDR and away from DRDRAM was from the IBM Microelectronics group which designs and makes SEMICONDUCTOR components. This is SEPARATE and DISTINCT from the IBM PC CO., the one that makes and sells PCs, and SEPARATE from the WORKSTATION and SERVER divisions. I have seen NO WORD about the PC Company Nor the Server Nor the Workstation groups that discuss DRDRAM memory. Paul