Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

pawn, re: If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? Japanese population is aging and can not meat the new challenges. As a result, INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant. Also INTC pay much higher production expense there. You are really clueless, most of Intel's production is in the USA. Let me get this straight, Old Japanese are not Y2K compliant?

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? Japanese population is aging and can not meat the new challenges. As a result, INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant. Also INTC pay much higher production expense there. Professor Irwin Corey (showing my age), wherever you are, please come over here and take care of your imitator.

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 12:42:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant. Really???? Where did you get this information. I find this very hard to believe. OG

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

dragonpawn - Re: "If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? " Congratulations. I didn't know anybody could be this ill-informed or this stupid. Paul

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? " I'm resisting the use of the term "imbecile" but it's hard. Intel has no production facilities in Japan. EP

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/1/1999 1:23:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Dragonpawn, Re: "If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? Japanese population is aging and can not meat the new challenges. As a result, INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant. Also INTC pay much higher production expense there." First of all welcome to the Intel thread. It is great to get a new fresh perpsective on Intel. Most of the Intel thread doesn't like to hear bad news on their company. I also think this Japanese Y2K problem could be a major problem particularly for Intel. AMD by the way is using german folks from Dresden to help it catch up with Intel. Just wait and see the effects of AMD's new Fresden Fab on Intel stock coupled by the y2K problem early next year. Regards, Kash

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/2/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

dragonpawn - <If everybody discovered that then why INTC's main production base is still in Japan? Japanese population is aging and can not meat the new challenges. As a result, INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant. Also INTC pay much higher production expense there.> You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Intel does not have any major manufacturing operations in Japan. PB

To: dragonpawn who wrote (82300)	6/3/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick	Respond to of 186894

Dragonpawn - Re:"INTC's main production base is still in Japan? Japanese population is aging and can not meat the new challenges. As a result, INTC's chips are not fully Y2K compliant." If you truly believe any of these sentences and their implications, I fear you will have a very short investing career. People can disagree over the interpretation of facts. But getting so many facts so wrong in one short paragraph suggests major cognitive problems. Major. This is a put-on, right?