Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirVinny who wrote (31804)	6/2/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Ruyi	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 37507

No such type of conduct by me . Tread lightly or you may find yourself in a slander action . Post one item where I have posted anything false , you won't /can't because I never have , never will.

To: SirVinny who wrote (31804)	6/3/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: John Freeman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

<<To: Wealthy1 (35 ) From: SirVinny Friday, May 14 1999 12:38AM ET Reply #45 of 45 Rumor has it that Yorkton was peeved at losing BIDS' future underwriting business to much larger and credible American firms. In view of the continuous barrage of negative comments made by the Nutty Professor, Mark Pavan, and several other Yorkton officials with regards to BIDS, the question remains whether Yorkton's actions were guided by Greed or Vindictiveness. Regardless of whether it was Greed or Vindictiveness, it is the opinion of many that their manipulative tactics were borderline fraudulent and should be investigated. Oh, by the way, Yorkton, please do sue me. There is nothing I want more than to be sitting in the witness stand. You know full well that it would give my lawyer the opportunity to counter-interrogate you and subpoena your files on Discovery. So, Kiss This! SirVinny >> <<Started By: SirVinny Date: May 2 1999 3:51AM ET After being the underwriters of BID.COM on three occasions and profiting from the sale of options as the stock price of BID.COM rose to $32.35, analyst Mark Pavan of Yorkton Securities shocked investors across North America as they released a stunning report suggesting that the stock which they so enthusiastically pushed only days before was worth no more than $2 to $3 CDN. This came only one day after BID.COM was listed on the NASDAQ. Even more stunning was that in the hours that ensued the massive selloff which saw the stock drop to $8.50, Yorkton was one of the most active buyers of BID.COM shares at prices considerably greater than the $2 to $3 they claimed the stock was worth. Is this a blatant example of stock manipulation ? Was Mark Pavan's report irresponsible ? Was Yorkton's actions suspicious ? Was there a motivation for this untimely report ? Do you think this merits an investigation ? Do you think shareholders were cheated ? Or is this simply the way the game is played ? This thread allows you to post your comments and opinions on whether or not you think Yorkton Securities is Guilty or Not Guilty of stock manipulation.>> Subject 27996 I guess there will be a lot of suits going on, and the only people that make any money are the lawyers, too bad later john