Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (29906)	6/2/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: JWC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Hey Zeev, Just wondering why do you give a rip about TSIG and why do you waste your time even posting here. What benefit are you receiving from your time spent discussing TSIG? Just wondering. Jeff

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (29906)	6/2/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Zeev, you are exactly right, we should slow down. Let's look at your first sentence. <<Suzzane, slow down, in the last SECdocument there were 17 MM share escrowed and the same document mentioned that 2 MM shares were released to the PP (if memory serves), same document was quite clear that said 17 MM shares were not outstanding the same document had a count of 80 MM share (and I presume that count already included the 2 MM shares released), I assumed that since then those left over 15 MM shares were "released" and became outstanding, if it is not the case, would you not want to know how between may 7 and may 29 the count went up by 15 MM shares?.>> Zeev, to be frank, I have great difficulty in following your logic. So I'll restate my position. The company does not consider the 15 million shares escrowed for the PP to be outstanding. The transfer agent, however, does consider these shares to be outstanding because the transfer agent and the escrow agent are not the same parties. Thus, until the debentures are converted, there will be a 15 million share difference between "outstanding shares" as reported by the company and "outstanding shares" reported by the transfer agent. This is what I thought to be the case, and this was confirmed today by Paul Henry. Regards, Suzanne

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (29906)	6/2/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Now, Zeev, for your second sentence. <<As for the shares increasing by only 4 MM since 1/1/99, it is contraindicated from the SEC documents that states quite clearly that on 12/31/98 there were 64,972,000 shares outstanding, unless of course, all the difference was issued on January 1st (and the SEC document would have stated that as well, it did not).>> Now, I get to eat crow. Your outstanding share count for 12/31/98 is correct. I was thinking that total was 76 million, a figure that does appear on the front of the 12/31/98 10KSB, but the effective date was 3/30/99. My error. While I am at it, I apologize for my angry tone. For over a year I have defended the right of negative posters such as yourself to post on this thread. My anger arose from what I perceived to be intentional misrepresentation. I'm calmer now. Love crow. Regards, Suzanne

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (29906)	6/2/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Renamed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Slow down Having been involved with several Conference Calls this is the most inane/insane I have ever encountered. 24 hour notice of the CC ? Guess who has the advantage here ? Not an 800 number, when we have a state of the art Call Center ? Limited to 150 callers ? Limited also to SI and RB ? How is the general public informed ? Are we the chosen few ? 30 minutes of talk/response time ? Some questions might very well take one half hour or more to answer. What a joke ! In view of the following and more: SB2 10QSB 10KSB S-8 S8-K 8-KA