Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: H James Morris who wrote (60329)	6/3/1999 10:48:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

The more I read your posts, the more I wonder why I read many of them. You'll say anything categorical about anything whether you understand it or not.

To: H James Morris who wrote (60329)	6/4/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Cheap?? If you think Ivil is cheap?? This $money loser will get cheaper!! How about $1 on the dollar of income?? There has been talk about IVIL being cheap. I am confused. I learned last year that the Inet stocks cannot be valued using conventual methods. This was surely the case with every analyst on the wya up. So if one cannot properly stae a value on AMZN, YHOO, etc. on the way up how does none state a value on IVIL on the way down? Traditional valuation methods do not mater so $1/share or $1000/share is the same is it not? Glenn