To: jhild who wrote (37503 ) 6/4/1999 5:01:00 PM From: PCModem Respond to of 43774
"Researh must be beyond your ability. " Now it is my turn to laugh. My clients disagree with your assessment. My broker does too. So do my fellow investors. Given your track record, when it comes to your opinions, I just consider the source. You really are funny sometimes. "There is no proof to your pudding. " That's because it is your pudding that is being discussed. You provide no facts about PABN because you refuse to go to the source for your information. Instead you harass us with the distractions you try to pass off as "verified information with links" about PABN. Which they are not. "No spine to your attacks against me. On this the record is quite clear. " That's because I am not attacking you. I'm just exposing your lies and revealing your true motivations. Thank you for acknowledging publicly that you do not consider what you call my "attacks against" you to be effective or serious. Does this mean you won't bite me now? "You never support your flaccid statements... " And in which particular category would you put your statements? Starting with the gem about the missing dollar sign. Or your statements that the SEC, NASD and FBI are not doing their jobs. Or your conspiracy theories, starting with the now famous CUSIP conspiracy, and your most recent one implicating the mob working with the SEC, NASD and PABN against the shareholders. Besides, I do provide support, as in this post. I have copied your very words. Support enough for my commentary. As I have pointed out on numerous occasions, it is you who do not support your comments about the company, its management and its business plan with verifiable information. You can't. Ever. You refuse to go to the source, so nothing you say about PABN can ever have any weight. You present your "opinions" which are the result of your own brain -- fabrications, which are, by definition without verifiable support. All the other information you present, while it may be accurate and good in a general sense, has no verifiable connection to PABN. It is like the information ww presented about accounting for reverse mergers: interesting, but has nothing to do with PABN because it was about another company, not PABN. Keep it up. With every post you build the case against yourself and make it stronger. PCM GO PABN!!!