Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: llwk7051@aol.com	Respond to of 152472

Dr Jacobs is supposed to be interviewed on Nightly Business report on Monday. Barrons comments by Castro: No wonder Castro has been wrong about Qcom. He has no understanding of Ericsson deal or royalty agreement. If he knows this little about this, why did he even mention Qcom. Good luck to all, Robert d.

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: Morgan Drake	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Anyone know how the Bluetooth technology will impact QCOM?

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 9:28:00 AM
From: Valueman	Respond to of 152472

There are more incorrect statements concerning CDMA in general later on in the Barron's interview. Another sick part of this interview is Grubman's continuous WCOM hype. The guy makes $25 million per year, is both an analyst and an investment banker(no conflict there) and uses Barron's to hype his biggest client on every page. Welcome to Wall Street!!!

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

This is one more example of not just poor journalism but an agenda other than reporting facts accurately and completely; namely, to influence stock price. This kind of behavior in BARRON'S is not unheard of over the past several years, particularly with regard to QCOM.

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: Sawtooth	Respond to of 152472

(from the article) <<The big question is, what will Qualcomm, which now is like a bank, do with all the money it received from selling its infrastructure business to Ericsson? I don't have an answer.>> But that every company I own a piece of had the problem of what to do with a huge chunk of cash. And those future revenue inflows from royalties; what the heck will they do with all that money? Sigh!

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 11:15:00 AM
From: JohnG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

"All the $ Q received from selling their infrastructure business to ERICY." This guy is really clueless!! John G

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

What an idiot without anyunderstanding at all. It exemplifies the fine sources that barrons uses!

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/5/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Should the traders of WS react to the Bearron's article in their predictably stupid ways, I would gladly scoop up some more shares of Q* -- still have some dry powder left. Ibexx

To: John Carragher who wrote (31786)	6/6/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 152472

Just arrived at the post about the moronic Barrons article on Telecomm stuff. Usually, I am reluctant to post a copyrighted Barrons article because I have a (slight) nagging fear that someone from Barrons could contact me and (legitimately) say "Come on, we're trying to run a business. Please do not 'give it away for free.' " This time, if I do end up posting it (I'll see if it posted later on in the thread), my only fear is that Barrons will reprimand me for posting such piss poor journalism. Jon.