SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ross Technology? Let's talk!
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
475 2 0 RTEC
Emcee:  Mark T. Heath Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
100 Yes, you're absolutely right! Thanks.nicole orbegoso-8/14/1996
99 If you read Sun's recent filing on the SEC's EDGAR database the detailsSean McGee-8/13/1996
98 Are you sure? Look at the column where it shows the change in red...doesn'nicole orbegoso-8/8/1996
97 Under the 5% holder section, SUNW is still their holder. By the way, tell us yPing HSU-8/8/1996
96 I wish I knew...I'll try to look into that! By the way, everyone, I am sornicole orbegoso-8/7/1996
95 hey Nicole - if market cap is 210mil, and shares are 23 mil, $9 seems fair vaPete Johnson-8/6/1996
94 I recommend rtec as both long and short term buys. Obviously, we have seen rtenicole orbegoso-7/31/1996
93 What is your firm position? Long term buy?Ping HSU-7/31/1996
92 Anyone out there wondering what's up with the drop in rtec lately? Well, panicole orbegoso-7/29/1996
91 thanks nicole for the info. volume was high today. out of the ordinary. are younc (guessed password)-7/23/1996
90 Scott, I thought the number for 1995 looked out of whack. Quite a typo!! ThanksJakeStraw-7/23/1996
89 please use 800/pro-info or call the company for accurate numbers. i'm sureThom-7/22/1996
88 J, It was $21.8 million not $218 million for the 1st Qt of 95'. Net incomscott maragioglio-7/22/1996
87 Where did you get your Wall St Journal numbers? The Web version of the WSJ had Michael Seningen-7/22/1996
86 Scott, According to The Wall St. Journal the same period sales in 1995 were $21JakeStraw-7/22/1996
85 J, What are you talking about! Numbers came in on the dot. The company cascott maragioglio-7/22/1996
84 To All, I for one am very disappointed in the numbers. I was hoping the Wall StJakeStraw-7/22/1996
83 alright! thanks for the info, Nicole. i thought the numbers might be coming oThom-7/19/1996
82 Hey guys, well, the numbers were on target. Mean estimates were for 16 cents, nicole orbegoso-7/19/1996
81 where is Nicole?! rtec didn't fall NEARLY as i wanted with such a correctioThom-7/17/1996
80 the market is taking no prisoners... report probably wont mean squat if it hapThom-7/16/1996
79 if they expect to report better than sunw, they don't sunw's report to Thom-7/15/1996
78 Thom: What do you mean? Good or bad?Ping HSU-7/15/1996
77 you don't know what that means? i think i do.... thanks for the info, NicThom-7/12/1996
76 To all rtec investors: New news: Ross Technology informed our firm that they hanicole orbegoso-7/11/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News