SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IMNR - Immune Response
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1510 20 0 IMNR
Emcee:  Nagaraju R. Arakotaram Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1010 Yes and actually a little lower if your reference is from 11 weeks prior Bob. Manny Gugliuzza-8/3/1998
1009 AHM, Can't you tell when someone is joking? Emec-8/2/1998
1008 AHM: David's statement was sarcastic, not matter-of-fact. If you werenjake burns-8/1/1998
1007 Solid gold courtesy of Forbes for those to read and learn how the NASDAQ reallyAHM-8/1/1998
1006 You have to be dreaming! While I did not see Oppenheiner on CNBC, I'm posiAHM-8/1/1998
1005 jake, I'll take a crack at that. assuming the overall market is flat or pPeter Singleton-8/1/1998
1004 Lest I am mistaken, I believe most stocks would take off upon the filing of thejake burns-8/1/1998
1003 Robert, I too used to think that IMNR would just sit there until the Remune appJohn S. Baker-8/1/1998
1002 Manny: I have started buying again...a while back a fund manager told me why IRobert DeHaven-7/31/1998
1001 CIBC Oppenheimer on CNBC today. Maybe they will talk about why they shorted thEmec-7/31/1998
1000 Post #1000 Go IMNR Brian Thomas Hertzog-7/30/1998
999 Soon, shorts will get the life squeezed out of them. I will enjoy watching it.Emec-7/30/1998
998 Thanks John for that informative source. And do not be surprised by the intraweManny Gugliuzza-7/29/1998
997 David is this a record high for short interest of late? ar. Manny Gugliuzza-7/29/1998
996 should we not use 690,00 ADV? AR. Manny Gugliuzza-7/29/1998
995 I believe that I was correcting the impressions that you and others on this boaAHM-7/29/1998
994viwes.comEmec-7/29/1998
993 Oh my! I guess that explains the drop. No surprise to many of us Robert. They wEmec-7/29/1998
992 What do you make of the new short interest numbers on IMNR? I remember you scofRobert Knight-7/29/1998
991 Retest the low of the year ... quite possibly. Or at least break through the lJohn S. Baker-7/28/1998
990 Sure am glad that all I did was *watch* today. IMNR kind of fell off a cliff aJohn S. Baker-7/27/1998
989 John: It looks like it will need to retest its lows of the year before moving billkirn-7/27/1998
988 Anybody else watching the chart for IMNR today? I am a bit surprised by the stJohn S. Baker-7/27/1998
987 I agree...good traders will do this. I think the time to do that trade was at 1Robert DeHaven-7/26/1998
986 Additional online resource -- for a year or two I have been a subscriber to BudJohn S. Baker-7/26/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News