SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Western Digital (WDC)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11057 105 0 WDC
Emcee:  Eric L Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10107 I think the only major departures from wdc,I think,will be those that have beenrest42-1/20/1999
10106 <<Book value is 47 million, or about $.50 per share... >> And that Z Analyzer-1/19/1999
10105 Hey, LK, take yes for an answer. 3 points tomorrow? The more the merrier. tom pope-1/19/1999
10104 >buried lumps of coal Well. Let's see. Book value is 47 million, or aboFrodo Baxter-1/19/1999
10103 OT Stitch, Like this: <pre> WDC SEG Unit shipmentsSam-1/19/1999
10102 assume the stock will fall, the option price will not fall as much as the stockEric-1/19/1999
10101 Sailor, <i><<what do you think Feb17-1/2's will be worth in theStitch-1/19/1999
10100 David, <i><<It is impossible to switch from massive losses to &quoStitch-1/19/1999
10099 Eric/Stitch ...what do you think Feb17-1/2's will be worth in the morning ?Sailor-1/19/1999
10098 Eric, <i><<why sell a stock that is turning around? >></i&Stitch-1/19/1999
10097 why sell a stock that is turning around? longer term I see a good story here ..Eric-1/19/1999
10096 Thank god I own alot more seagate than WDC but my WDC cost is high 16s so I havFlan-1/19/1999
10095 tom, <i><<Well, they did beat estimates, and I don't see any Stitch-1/19/1999
10094 >Why was it unrealistic - Have you come to expect losses. It is impossible David Harker-1/19/1999
10093 Why was it unrealistic - Have you come to expect losses. Seg was profitable - Flan-1/19/1999
10092 To all: Looks like we got the sell-off in the morning I expected and thus puttizalesky-1/19/1999
10091 They just raises their stock ceiling(total number could be allowed). They diken Su-1/19/1999
10090 I agree, but the positives overcome the negatives in this flurry of press releaDavid Harker-1/19/1999
10089 >0.93 loss what a joke. If you were in charge I'm sure they would have David Harker-1/19/1999
10088 Problem here is the fact that they are going to dilute the shares with an offerrest42-1/19/1999
10087 >><i>(please no comments about beating the estimate)<<</itom pope-1/19/1999
10086 I was expecting more --- Another terrible qtr - still losing lots of money stilFlan-1/19/1999
10085 Here are the details: Tuesday January 19, 4:05 pm Eastern Time Company Press RStitch-1/19/1999
10084 The results are out Western Digital Q2 Revs $738.6 Mln Vs $969.6 Mln (This is aFrancois Amouzouvi-1/19/1999
10083 To All: Anybody has the conference call number for today quarterly result annoGreg Wai-1/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News