SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Network Appliance
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10934 322 0 NTAP
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10134>>Then you don't realize why they murdered the stock price either. ThJakeStraw-5/13/2002
10133<i>Didn't realize NTAP was a "dot bomb" company... </i>BirdDog-5/13/2002
10132>>Please tell me why ntap hasn't gone belly up with the rest of the doJakeStraw-5/13/2002
10131<i>G-Game Bible....LOL! What a load of horse pies that turned out to be! &BirdDog-5/13/2002
10130CC at: investors.netapp.comJacob Snyder-5/13/2002
10129NTAP announces at 5PM tomorrow.SPSEIFERT-5/13/2002
10128re: So whats new? You may have been hearing it from some people for the last 3 Jacob Snyder-5/13/2002
10127>> I tried to warn them it was smelling loud of Jim-Jonesism's a few yUncle Frank-5/13/2002
10126<i>I think we may be currently seeing the last buying opportunity, at reasratan lal-5/13/2002
10125>>My two copies have made excellent door stops and liner for the parrotJakeStraw-5/13/2002
10124<i>>>... they're all still clutching to that G-Game Bible. LOL!Dr. Id-5/13/2002
10123>>On the bright side NTAP looks to be a decent company when you get right JakeStraw-5/13/2002
10122Jake....take it light man, they're all still clutching to that G-Game Bible.Stoctrash-5/12/2002
10121Ferget it, fer now. When earnings and the future are uncertain, Big Money will Selectric II-5/12/2002
10120Jacob... I've a few of my own to add to your list. 1. Earnings. We'll chaz-5/11/2002
10119I'm bullish because: 1. the Nas bottomed at 1387 in 9/01 (making an elegantJacob Snyder-5/11/2002
10118Jacob, please explain your bullishness for the rest of us. Thanks.dstange-5/11/2002
10117Uncle Frank, If it helps, I have been very bearish for more than two years. I paul_philp-5/10/2002
10116>> I think we may be currently seeing the last buying opportunity, at reaUncle Frank-5/10/2002
10115From the 9-10/2001 low to today's close: Nas: 1387 to 1600 = up 15%, at a leJacob Snyder-5/10/2002
10114Analyst James Berlino said in a research note that he set "equal weight&quoJakeStraw-5/10/2002
10113>>Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, shuddup. Very mature. BTW, have you ever even posted herJakeStraw-5/10/2002
10112<delete>paul_philp-5/10/2002
10111>>Everybody has a right to post what they want. Not according to Uncle FrJakeStraw-5/10/2002
10110Ok guys, knock it off. We don't want to read it either. Everybody has a ridstange-5/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):