SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Wind River going up, up, up!
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10309 186 0 WIND
Emcee:  Allen Benn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10159Only the "potential" $$$$$$$ coming their way. Here's a link if yoehasfjord-11/1/2002
10158I like that they are keeping their eyes on the prize. Does anyone know what'Peter Church-10/31/2002
10157Bought some WIND a couple weeks ago and again this morning with pocket change I Snowshoe-10/31/2002
10156Not dead money if you bought it just a few days ago. This is getting interestinPeter Church-10/30/2002
10155I believe that you did the correct thing. WIND may be "dead" money forehasfjord-10/27/2002
10154Yes, "Time to Market" has been Wind's mantra for the past 10 yearsPeter Church-10/25/2002
10153Peter I have had this one for several years . They had great upside potentialSPSEIFERT-10/25/2002
10152I don't pretend to know where this stock is going, but I bought some again oPeter Church-10/25/2002
10151Hi there, I've tried the crystal ball approach, various fortune tellers, andehasfjord-10/17/2002
10150WIND is selling near Tangible Book(TB), but the key concern is that revenues havThe Ox-10/16/2002
10149So, What do you forsee WIND doing, at least in the near future? Are they undeehasfjord-10/16/2002
10148Processors begin 64-bit push By Rick Merritt EE Times October 14, 2002 (2:16 pThe Ox-10/15/2002
10147HI Carol, I have not been picking anything up lately, and I would avoid telecomlkj-10/10/2002
10146Yes, I'm still here from time to time, don't like looking at stocks nearCarol M. Morse-10/9/2002
10145Side point; given the projected earnings for WIND for 2003 and 2004, remaining inoel berge-10/9/2002
10144Hi Carol and all of the old timers, I agree with you that there are a lot of chlkj-10/9/2002
10143They still are the gorilla in the embedded arena, and what is happening to them Carol M. Morse-10/3/2002
10142Thanks for your comments. This article seems to imply that there will be furtPeter Church-10/2/2002
10141Snowshoe, okay, I didn't look that far back. Yes, in late 2000 it looks likAusdauer-10/1/2002
10140<I>other than Blaisdell the "sells" have been miniscule.</I&gSnowshoe-9/30/2002
10139Snowshoe, other than Blaisdell the "sells" have been miniscule. PerhaAusdauer-9/30/2002
10138I just checked the insider action on WIND. Except for a few small buys, theySnowshoe-9/29/2002
10137Thanks for the link! Take Careehasfjord-9/29/2002
10136<I>Do any of the more financially savvy readers have an idea what the flooSnowshoe-9/28/2002
10135price to tbv ratio multexinvestor.comGottfried-9/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News