The Perils and Pitfalls of Investing With "Friends"

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The Perils and Pitfalls of Investing With "Friends"

An SI Board Since October 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
377	57	0

Emcee: Bill Ulrich	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
102	Bill, I suggested privately because earlier posts with references to companies	Intrepid1	-	10/27/2004
101	Your SEC filing link states verbatim that Michal got back 90% of his money? If t	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
100	Bill, Michael did get back 90% of his money on his 419 investment. A 419 is a bl	Intrepid1	-	10/27/2004
99	Right here, for questions 1-6: Subject 27856 You should also know that TLC tri	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
98	Bill a few questions... When you received the settlement money and the insuranc	Intrepid1	-	10/27/2004
97	etc. , Slow down and think about this a minute: Michal didn't get back 90%	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
96	Bill, You are beginning to annoy me. Quit twisting the truth. Michal Daniel did	Intrepid1	-	10/27/2004
95	It's been suggested that a timeline be established. Anybody care to post som	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
94	I believe many on this thread was involved in that one.<g> I still don	Cisco	-	10/27/2004
93	Dang, that brings back some memories! <g>	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
92	Remember this thread? Subject 16571 The people involved are certainly named in	Cisco	-	10/27/2004
91	I did know at one time: "Bill knows that I am not TLC." I've also	Bill Ulrich	-	10/27/2004
90	I hope you reported that to the then-current site administration because people	SI Bob	-	10/26/2004
89	This was all publicly covered on the thread appropriate to that subject. That th	Bill Ulrich	-	10/26/2004
88	I think your attitude is appreciated that you are at least not knee jerking and	Buckey	-	10/26/2004
87	Frankly I never liked the PM thing. I used it for sure but I bet I havent used	Buckey	-	10/26/2004
86	Bob, just a thought on this matter. Would there be any legal liability from rem	Cisco	-	10/26/2004
85	Thought I made it pretty clear that though I'm leaning a particular directio	SI Bob	-	10/26/2004
84	I did read your posts to Michal, the ones where you assured Michal that he act	Bill Ulrich	-	10/26/2004
83	Bob, I can understand your concerns. It's not a helpful precedent to have a	Edscharp	-	10/26/2004
82	I am not saying that TLC created threads targeting people. I am not aware of th	Jorj X Mckie	-	10/26/2004
81	As you know, this wasn't an off-the-cuff thing. I PMed you a month ago or mo	Bill Ulrich	-	10/26/2004
80	there was a vote for A&P and his membership? Interesting. I stuck to a few	Buckey	-	10/26/2004
79	<i>one of the worst decisions that SI management made (IMO) is to leave th	SI Bob	-	10/26/2004
78	Huh? Could you explain that one a little more clearly, please? Two members and a	Bill Ulrich	-	10/26/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):