SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10221<i>There is an AMAT Off-topic thread, where one may feel free to discuss aRobert Douglas-2/8/2002
10220Enron has to do with fraud. Dishonesty is a drag on the performance of a capitawillcousa-2/8/2002
10219RE: "What is "capitalism to excess"?" Say the magic word anCary Salsberg-2/8/2002
10218What is "capitalism to excess"?willcousa-2/8/2002
10217Robert Maire - Semiconductor Capital Equipment Industry Overview (Bear Stearns) Terry D-2/8/2002
10216<i> There is an AMAT Off-topic thread, where one may feel free to discuss TimF-2/8/2002
10215There is an AMAT Off-topic thread, where one may feel free to discuss any topic Cary Salsberg-2/8/2002
10214Its very off topic, I'll reply in PM. TimTimF-2/8/2002
10213<i>So free markets are bad because there are abuses? I could just as easilProud_Infidel-2/8/2002
10212<i>Why not visit some of the places supposedly helped by growth before speRobert Douglas-2/8/2002
10211I will put it another way. Subsidizing rice is not in the interest of free tradwillcousa-2/8/2002
10210Robert - Very well said.willcousa-2/8/2002
10209<i>What aspect of SUBSIDIZED rice has anything to do with free trade? <Proud_Infidel-2/8/2002
10208What aspect of SUBSIDIZED rice has anything to do with free trade?willcousa-2/8/2002
10207You seem to be implying that it is wrong to create wealth and that it is somehowwillcousa-2/8/2002
10206There are good reasons for the concentration of wealth - I don't think that willcousa-2/8/2002
10205<i>Well then we're even because I can't comprehend your logic eithProud_Infidel-2/8/2002
10204<i>I don't follow your logic here. We have had growth throughout the wRobert Douglas12/8/2002
10203<i>I can readily accept that certain non silicon niche applications may weSemiBull-2/7/2002
10202Surely you'd accept that there are at least 100's of Billions of dollarsIan@SI-2/7/2002
10201My point was a relative statement in response to Ian. And I am not at liberty tSemiBull-2/7/2002
10200>>Have you familiarized yourself with the most recent last November's Katherine Derbyshire-2/7/2002
10199SB, I can only view the abstract as I do not have a subscription. What is theProud_Infidel-2/7/2002
10198Brian, I believe some of their published work is directed towards self-assembleSemiBull-2/7/2002
10197SB, No on both counts. BrianProud_Infidel-2/7/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News