SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Lunn Industries (LUNN)
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1436 0 0 LUNN
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1036 (PR NEWSWIRE) Lunn Industries, Inc. Merger With Technical Products Group, IncVALUESPEC-9/28/1997
1035 (PR NEWSWIRE) Lunn Industries, Inc. Approves Merger with Technical Products GVALUESPEC-9/28/1997
1034 I don't like LUNN. I liked CADE and RECY and stated so at much lower levelVALUESPEC-9/28/1997
1033 OH, I believe it's a "combination" in which they tried to assessLinda Kaplan-9/28/1997
1032 Hi Ken and all, Hi all, I am still here. Read your posts. Love it. I wisOSHANL-9/28/1997
1031 Now you know how I feel after I've been gone a week !! Takes forever, toChartgod-9/28/1997
1030 Hi Gang, I'm new to the thread. I bought lunn last week. Whenever a reverseGlenn M-9/28/1997
1029 You guys were way too busy here yesterday. When I get caught up on the thread Doug R-9/28/1997
1028 Pages 28-30 cover Allen's valuation in greater detail In my response to PiDante Sinferno-9/28/1997
1027 TPG contract backlog at 9-15-97 is $585mm. Of that sum, $145mm is released formichael c. dodge-9/28/1997
1026 Yes, that's the difficult part. We can determine how much newco we get, anPierre-9/28/1997
1025 Thanks, Bond. It makes sense and seems more than fair. From other posts it alPierre-9/28/1997
1024 Peter: I was so smart, I got to skip math :) Carole Carole-9/27/1997
1023 Ben, I went through a reverse split also. KLOCD. Bought it at .50 went down tKen W-9/27/1997
1022 Sergio, < wonder what your fields look like> Just don't fly over inKen W-9/27/1997
1021 <<<2. Assuming that is the case, how was it determined that LUNN is vaDante Sinferno-9/27/1997
1020 <Ken W. (dizzy from reading)> Wonder what your fields look like. LOL Sergio H-9/27/1997
1019 Ben, for a great example on reverse splits, check MDRX. This is my number 1 moSergio H-9/27/1997
1018 Sergio, I understand. The numbers were hypothetical. I also understand that Ken W-9/27/1997
1017 Sergio, My last experience with a reverse split has been a deadly one. I brouTheInvestor-9/27/1997
1016 Ken, thanks. Only thing is that when it opens as newco. there is no guarantee Sergio H-9/27/1997
1015 Sergio, Not directed at you buddy. What part of this do not these people underKen W-9/27/1997
1014 Brad, you mean that this is not a reverse split? LOL I've got an idea. TSergio H-9/27/1997
1013 <<I have seldom seen a reverse split work out for shareholders for a veryBraddock Bull-9/27/1997
1012 Carole: You will be the owner of 130 shares, not 103. Regards PetePeter van Steennis-9/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):