SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10393<i>Richard Band of "Profitable Investing" - - "I've givtejek-5/29/2002
10392I have spent the last little bit looking at WCOM's debt maturities and I'BEEF JERKEY-5/29/2002
10391perhaps more herd mentality. Richard Band of "Profitable Investing" - Kal Perry-5/29/2002
10390<I>Lets see how the market reacts tomorrow. I agree there was negligible rtejek-5/28/2002
10389WCOM Employee View on Tauzin-Dingell Last post and I'll shut up (I'm lorupers-5/28/2002
10388If you're long WCOM, I'd recommend you keep track of two bills currentlyrupers-5/28/2002
10387<I>Why does WCOM need the $5 billion bank line, if it already is cash flowtejek-5/28/2002
10386John The following is another article explaining the situation of ILECs vs WCOMrupers-5/28/2002
10385<i>It just kills me looking at the herd mentality of Wall St. When the stotejek-5/28/2002
10384<I>However, a CEO is supposed to work for the owner of the company, i.e. ttejek-5/28/2002
10383Interesting thought! However, a CEO is supposed to work for the owner of the coEd Zhao-5/28/2002
10382<i>This isn't to say WCOM doesn't have troubles. Lord knows they dtejek-5/28/2002
10381So far looks good,but don't get over bullish on WCOM.The stock went up almosel paradisio-5/28/2002
10380Yeah - I've read everyone of those articles. Talk about telling you about wBEEF JERKEY-5/28/2002
10379Here's the sampling of the BK press I was talking about, it looks like populTheStockFairy-5/28/2002
10378So, call me stupid, but what other companies have the <i> popular view <Thomas Walker-5/28/2002
10377Well, leaving Wall Street out of it, a red herring is any device used to distracOeconomicus-5/28/2002
10376Does anyone know the exact date when the new WCOM CEO will lay out his new businRock_nj-5/28/2002
10375Hmmm. I seem to remember Harry Truman accussing his political opponents of invokRock_nj-5/28/2002
10374LOL! That's an interesting theory... but completely wrong. It has nothing toOeconomicus-5/28/2002
10373Rupers: Interesting article. I hadn't realized the Court had made this decJohn Curtis-5/28/2002
10372Pete, et.al.: <i>Why are bandwidth prices are going up with this embarrasJohn Curtis-5/28/2002
10371I'm still taking the popular view that wcom will buckle under it's debt TheStockFairy-5/28/2002
10370/start nonsensical rant It's also cheaper for me, through some carriers forTheStockFairy-5/28/2002
10369Yeah. I did read that article (or one similar to it) on Friday. My first impreBEEF JERKEY-5/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News