SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1040Ray, they had to dry out some ballots in a microwave in one of the elections (doportage-11/8/2001
1039San Francisco MUD Hi portage, Here's the latest I could find on the opporRaymond Duray-11/8/2001
1038A reasonably good, objective if short article on California's next energy moportage-11/8/2001
1037Thanks Ron. I hope they start putting as much money and effort into these kind portage-11/8/2001
1036Really interesting article on the potential of hydrogen and one of its leading pRon-11/8/2001
1035I'm buying all the A, C and D size batteries in Houston. I'll open my oKevin McKenzie-11/8/2001
1034Let's see. If Chevron is based in California and controls Dynegy which may portage-11/8/2001
1033Has anyone seen a web site that breaks out uses of petroleum by category? It isRon-11/3/2001
1032It figures that you would think that that is "the best Taliban joke yet&quoSam-11/3/2001
1031To my board friends here on the looney left. Today I saw the best Taliban joke Bearcatbob-11/2/2001
1030<i>As soon as prices went up - consumption went down - and prices fell.<Zeuspaul-11/2/2001
1029>>Sorta like some people really believe Hillary did not know how the billiportage-11/1/2001
1028"It was deregulated more than any other electric utility market." As Bearcatbob-11/1/2001
1027portage, I got around to the Dr. Jeff view of executive compensation. He has aRaymond Duray-11/1/2001
1026portage, Re: <i>Ray, I don't know what to say anymore. I am just comRaymond Duray-11/1/2001
1025Ray, I don't know what to say anymore. I am just completely disbelieving thportage-10/31/2001
1024Re: <b>Special rules apply to Texas. </b> Amen, and here's a gRaymond Duray-10/31/2001
1023<i>The problem, as I understand it, is that deregulation of electric powerZeuspaul-10/31/2001
1022<i>If you call forced divestiture of power generation</i> The oil cZeuspaul-10/31/2001
1021Bowers, the following represents a consequence of extreme trust in your point ofportage-10/30/2001
1020Hi Jim, Re: <i>But to hear Duray defend tired socialist dogma as anythinRaymond Duray-10/30/2001
1019<i>But to hear Bowers defend raw capitalism as anything other than sheer gmiraje-10/30/2001
1018<i>More like the lack of rules and regulations...pure capitalism at its bemiraje-10/30/2001
1017Zeuspaul, re: working system need fine tuning. The problem, as I understand it,DavesM-10/30/2001
1016Zeuspaul, Bravo! Nice post. I'd love to hear Bowers defense of Samuel InRaymond Duray-10/30/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):