SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Compuware (CPWR)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1627 27 0 CPWR
Emcee:  David M. Kaplan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1052 I think it is still this y2k BS the anal-ysts keep harping on. No evidence of iGeneral Crude-10/28/1999
1051 Paul, In this environment it is not about PE. Everyone is expecting the Nasdaqlebo-10/28/1999
1050 Folks, has anybody an idea, why CPWR plummeted 8% yesterday? I feel like beeinPaul M. Rengier-10/28/1999
1049 From zdii.com >>"Given that there has never been a correlation betwJohn Finley-10/22/1999
1048 Beachbumm, You hit the nail on the head. I took this opportunity to repurchaseJohn Finley-10/21/1999
1047 Got assigned 1600 last Sat. (was short the Oct 30 puts) Sold additional Nov putJohn D. White-10/20/1999
1046 Beachbumm, Re:>>CPWR will be guilty by association tomorrow due to IBMJohn Finley-10/20/1999
1045 >>>>I am curious to know if you have covered your short position. majormember-10/20/1999
1044 John, there haven't been too many words, hallowed or otherwise, on this thrBeachbumm-10/20/1999
1043 Wow that was a lot of questions on the CC. Pete and Joe were very civil to theJohn Finley-10/20/1999
1042 John, that's great news (about "phenomenon"). Looks like all theBeachbumm-10/20/1999
1041 According to rb1rb1 on Yahoo! >>CC replay# 888.566.0129<< I havenJohn Finley-10/20/1999
1040 Does anyone know if the conference call was taped, and if it was, what the phonDave Kartzman-10/20/1999
1039 That 5.25 (21%) rise may look like alot but if the 3 point drop of yesterday isJohn Finley-10/19/1999
1038 Well, we did indeed test the 21-25 area you mentioned, but I am curious to knowBeachbumm-10/19/1999
1037 Congrats to all who bought yesterday. Hope that this is the start of a new runFrank Drumond-10/19/1999
1036 OK, I'm a happy camper. I would certainly like to thank the Soundview analJohn Finley-10/19/1999
1035 Maybe they wanted to pick up some shares cheap. Arghhh! I can't believe IJohn Finley-10/19/1999
1034 Soundview was conspicuously absent at the Conference Call. They really should pGeneral Crude-10/18/1999
1033compuware.comSkeet Shipman-10/18/1999
1032 Soundview is wrong more often than right. My other favorites are Barton Biggs,John D. White-10/18/1999
1031 Re: phenomenon/phenomena I got caught on that one once. I'd like to thinkJohn Finley-10/18/1999
1030 At this time the numbers don't bother me so much as the words. I wonder whBeachbumm-10/18/1999
1029 Soundview's Mendehlson (sp?) may have been trying to make a name for himselBostonView-10/18/1999
1028 It is last traded at 26 3/4 in after market (Island Book).Max Banan-10/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News