OAKLEY- NYSE:OO | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1383	7	0	OO

Emcee: stockvalinvestor	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1058	Grass, Your words may have been chosen correctly for the other shoe to drop. L	Greg Ballinger	-	9/17/1997
1057	Giles, your words are well chosen and recieved. Fact is, EVERY SINGLE STOCK I	grasshopper	-	9/17/1997
1056	In typical Oakley fashion, the stock dropped on a day that saw an incredible ra	Dr. Jeff	-	9/16/1997
1055	Dr. Jeff, you may be right about there being other opportunities that may move	grasshopper	-	9/16/1997
1054	Grasshopper, You should do well with OO. It has minimal downside risk with go	giles	-	9/16/1997
1053	Dr Jeff, Couldnt agree with you more. Why waste time on a company that says on	dave luken	-	9/15/1997
1052	I don't want to wait for this piece of crap to go anywhere. Plenty of othe	Dr. Jeff	-	9/15/1997
1051	Okay Grass, I take your challenge. 2500 shares of OO at 11 3/8 now in my long	Brian C. Lund	-	9/15/1997
1050	Jannard must be as stupid as I to buy one more million shares; Maybe he's g	Christian Braboretz	-	9/15/1997
1049	Time will tell....... Still sleeping;Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzhhhhhh..........	Christian Braboretz	-	9/15/1997
1048	DR. Jeff, Mr. Lund, the two of you are pretty intelligent ,. . . . but no guts,	grasshopper	-	9/15/1997
1047	The company and the stock are struggling! You'd be better off buying a pac	Dr. Jeff	-	9/14/1997
1046	Greetings to all of you on this board, Until yesterday I knew nothing about th	Elliot Lepler	-	9/13/1997
1045	Yes, I bet he will do at least as well as a savings account would.... OO has ma	Dr. Jeff	-	9/12/1997
1044	Well, you can't argue with logic like that. I'm sure you will make a l	Brian C. Lund	-	9/10/1997
1043	Oakley says H2 EPS estimates "conservative" By Jack Reerink NEW YO	StormRider	-	9/10/1997
1042	I dont know how they made their estimation; .16, .15, .9,or even .7 .How can th	Christian Braboretz	-	9/10/1997
1041	See ya Dave! OO didn't take the big hit I thought it would. As low as 10	Brian C. Lund	-	9/9/1997
1040	I'm out. David	David Naggar	-	9/9/1997
1039	Steve, the point is, over/underpriced based on what? Earnings, please!!! Look	Brian C. Lund	-	9/9/1997
1038	Today Gruntal & Co. cuts OO earnings estimates to Q3 .09 from .16 Q4 .07	giles	-	9/9/1997
1037	I am talking fundamental value. The PSR for RAYS is considered "low"	Steven Angelil	-	9/9/1997
1036	Well Grass, I'm glad you're thinking like me,buy at weakness! Just watc	Christian Braboretz	-	9/9/1997
1035	....You must have felt it was undervalued at some point in that sequence, as pe	Brian C. Lund	-	9/9/1997
1034	......and where in this sequence would RAYS be undervalued? 36, 35, 34 ,33, 32	Brian C. Lund	-	9/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):