SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
2000-Year of the Biotechs!
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1142 41 0
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1067My 2000 Biotech group topped 122% YTD. Thank you TTP!Arthur Radley-9/25/2000
1066The Biotechnology Sector has held up quite well during this recent market sell oReturn to Sender-9/24/2000
1065Among the bigger name Biotechs that are oversold INCY still remains on my screenReturn to Sender-9/9/2000
1064Among the bigger name Biotechs that are oversold INCY still remains on my screenReturn to Sender-9/9/2000
1063Thanks! Going forward, I would hope that anyone buying shares of biotechs, they Arthur Radley-9/9/2000
1062Congratulations on your Biotech 2000 portfolio. You picks have been very impressblackmerlin-9/9/2000
1061Thanks to Peter Stutzman on the Biotech Valuation thread. <b>Playing the opalapril-9/8/2000
1060OT - Hyperlinks. <b>Assessing Linking Liability</b> nytimes.com (fopalapril-9/8/2000
1059Are we looking like we have seen the best of the run on the Biotechs this time aReturn to Sender-9/7/2000
1058What a day for biotechs....my Biotech2000 portfolio is within $1,000 of being upArthur Radley-9/7/2000
1057I brought both INCY and PDLI to the attention of some of the people on the TechnReturn to Sender-9/7/2000
1056Stefaan these two stocks may not actually be bargains. They are simply oversold Return to Sender-9/7/2000
1055"i think incy is spilling money and energy in their lawsuit against affx ansam-9/7/2000
1054RTS could you point out why they are bargains ? i think incy is spilling money dalroi-9/7/2000
1053Although I expect more profit taking in the Biotech Sector. There are now two goReturn to Sender-9/6/2000
1052Hey, Dennis! Thanks I needed that...but back to the real world of setting historArthur Radley-9/6/2000
1051The Top 14 Things Texans Do to Beat the Heat [ The Top 5 List topfive.com ] [ CoDennis C-9/6/2000
1050Excellent special feature article in this week's Business Week magazine: &quArthur Radley-9/5/2000
1049...and a more recent article the-scientist.comMike McFarland-9/5/2000
1048I agree. The system is badly flawed and it needs to be questioned on an ongoing Torben Noerup Nielsen-9/4/2000
1047Saw a remark recently on the subject of Nafster and copyright law that makes gooopalapril-9/4/2000
1046I read the article. So what? Charging $12.50 per test as a roylaty doesn't sTorben Noerup Nielsen-9/4/2000
1045West coast USPTO symposia uspto.gov read the-scientist.com However, I don'Mike McFarland-9/4/2000
1044Torben, You ask, "How much will the likely royalty be as a percentage of opalapril-9/4/2000
1043All this noise about gene patents sounds a bit silly. So what if every single huTorben Noerup Nielsen-9/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):