SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
McLeod, Inc. (MCLD) ---- IPO
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1418 32 0 MCLD
Emcee:  Sabrina Issac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1068Softecie, For now, I think MCLD will be fine. All they need to do is stop spenRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1067Larry, I think you are OK with MCLD at least until the 10Q comes out. Like I sRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1066Ashley, I feel for you. Been there done that a few years ago. Wish you the besRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1065Larry, Cheer up. Just remember one thing. Your in a penny stock an the rules cRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1064Hi Larry, I picked up a boat load of this stuff today myself. I figured it wouRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1063Hi Storm, Don't you think that was being a little hasty? I don't thinkRonald P. Margraf Sr.-11/29/2001
1062yeah, i agree with you. i probably will buy back in. but the big question is hStormRider-11/29/2001
1061STORM, How about FL covering his short positions now, regardless of whos name heLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1060from the yahoo boards... Fortsmann Little's Strategy by: waterboy007 Long-StormRider-11/29/2001
1059I know it COULD of survived. But the direction already has been taken. ManagemenAshley800-11/29/2001
1058I think McLeod can survive on its own w/o cash infusion from FL. Now McLeod manaSoftechie-11/29/2001
1057Ashley800, O.K. Back to those lousy SEC's. I'll try to find where they wLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1056Larry, are you assuming no connection between MCLD and FL? If so you are dead wrAshley800-11/29/2001
1055I would like to see a post where FL has leverage on MCLD, nor do I see MCLD in nLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1054StormRider, MCLD looks to be fine to me, unless they are in bed with FL as it apLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1053yes, xoxo is halted, and the anger is being takin out on mcld...StormRider-11/29/2001
1052Ashley800, Did you trade any shares on the dips and peaks to offset losses. ILarry Brew-11/29/2001
1051Why XOXO not trading? Halted?Softechie-11/29/2001
1050No Larry I don't know anything except we use MCLD as our underlying carrier Ashley800-11/29/2001
1049Ashley800, I made a couple buys yesterday afternoon in ENE on a long shot. Out tLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1048I just dumped all my shares (over 120,000). I think MCLD could definitely turn Ashley800-11/29/2001
1047Ashley800, I'd never thought it, but so far your right on for XOXO anyway. SLarry Brew-11/29/2001
1046I posted this on Sept. 25th (Too bad I still bought in) Message 16412508 <Is Ashley800-11/29/2001
1045Apparently Forstmann and company are the devil and a shareholder looking for theBWAC-11/29/2001
1044StormRider, I may have wish I sold out, but added at .62. It's puckered up Larry Brew-11/29/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News