Vantage Enterprises Inc - VEC on Vancouver

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Vantage Enterprises Inc - VEC on Vancouver

An SI Board Since November 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1476	7	0	VEC

Emcee: Mark Bartlett	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1101	Big difference is that VEC is taking goods out of the ground, Bre-X appears (re	Gary Gwynn	-	4/9/1997
1100	Mike & all...Deal pending. Will not publish details till done in about sev	jocko	-	4/9/1997
1099	I was going through my file on Vantage when I came across an article from the F	Ralph Kern	-	4/9/1997
1098	Tom: Yes, and for those who might think this: I do not see my point as "V	Winer	-	4/8/1997
1097	Winer, <<For further problems with the VSE check the Starpoint thread at	Mark Bartlett	-	4/8/1997
1096	Winer: You've got that right. I have been following this thing even thoug	Tom McIlwain	-	4/8/1997
1095	For further problems with the VSE check the Starpoint thread at: Subject 4337	Winer	-	4/8/1997
1094	As of 7:51 PDT, VEC was quoted at $3.10, up 0.30, 3-3.25 at 5x28. Kacy	Not_Active	-	4/8/1997
1093	As far as I can see, VEC has not yet traded today. Olga	mappingworld	-	4/8/1997
1092	Kevin, What was the opening? My Canada Stockwatch is having problems today. TI	Rocky	-	4/8/1997
1091	Based on the opening, have we finally reversed the trend?? Hopefully the full d	kfdkfd	-	4/8/1997
1090	Daniel, <<Looks like the company has the following priority.>> Co	Mark Bartlett	-	4/8/1997
1089	Mark, Yes. Looks like the company has the following priority. 1) pp 2) NASDA	Daniel	-	4/8/1997
1088	Tom T, Tom M and All, It seems I am the only one with this concern. In that ca	Daniel	-	4/8/1997
1087	Daniel, <<But in our case, VEC should or believed to (otherwise they wer	Mark Bartlett	-	4/7/1997
1086	A couple of more points: Private placement are restricted stock with a 12 mo.	tom terry	-	4/7/1997
1085	Daniel: First of all, we don't know for sure at this point that it <b&g	Tom McIlwain	-	4/7/1997
1084	Thanks Terry, <<The practice of doing small private placements when the	Daniel	-	4/7/1997
1083	The practice of doing small private placements when the stock price is low is p	tom terry	-	4/7/1997
1082	Thanks Mark, <<PP are usually based on a percentage of the stock price (	Daniel	-	4/6/1997
1081	Thanks Yvon, <<The PP announced Friday was the one announced on Oct 04,	Daniel	-	4/6/1997
1080	Look back at events in Sept. and Oct. and original PP, doesn't it appear t	kfdkfd	-	4/6/1997
1079	Daniel, <<My only question is -- Why now? Why at this price?>> PP	Mark Bartlett	-	4/6/1997
1078	Daniel, The PP announced Friday was the one announced on Oct 04, 1996. All this	Yvon Guitard	-	4/6/1997
1077	Daniel, I too feel screwed again. My shares were bought before the halt at $4	Mozingo	-	4/5/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):