SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3602 25 0 ENE
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1102Just my opinion.JBTFD-2/2/2002
1101Hi KLP, the article was basically a diatribe of class envy. Reflecting to a larggreenspirit-2/2/2002
1100Nothing these folks say would surprise me.c.horn-2/2/2002
1099That was a good article. Thanks for the reference.JBTFD-2/2/2002
1098We'll see, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit.greenspirit-2/2/2002
1097Trading favors? How so?c.horn-2/2/2002
1096Ralph Nader? LOLc.horn-2/2/2002
1095It's "interesting" how much TheGuardian pokes their nose into affaKLP-2/2/2002
1094It doesnt appear to me that you can pin the fall of Enron on either administratiJBTFD-2/2/2002
1093Since you so strongly believe President Bush is too corrupt to lead America. Pergreenspirit-2/2/2002
1092Hi, Raymond!! Re WEF, etc ... <<NO APARTHEID FOR IMMIGRANTS! HANDS OFF OUbonnuss_in_austin-2/2/2002
1091LOL!! / bia / eombonnuss_in_austin-2/2/2002
1090We're not smart enough to understand. Only the intellectuals with their snooc.horn-2/2/2002
1089At least we know that Enron was closer to the Clinton regime - at least in termsZoltan!-2/2/2002
1088We're glad you agree that the fall of Enron had less than nothing to do withZoltan!-2/2/2002
1087FROM ANOTHER THREAD: More on Enron from The GuardianUnlimited, across the Pond.James Calladine-2/2/2002
1086You ARE a shorter, aren't you! Hah! I liked that <i>Inside informatiDon Pueblo-2/2/2002
1085A little humor. sfgate.comDorine Essey-2/2/2002
1084PARENTHOOD - Does it get any better? nytimes.com <i> "I walked intoRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
1083I've had some good moments and bad. But I think that if you want to think abRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
1082I bet you failed at business and are just bitter with the world. You look down wc.horn-2/2/2002
1081Enron was, in layman's terms, a nest of dirtballs bia, Have fun: miamiRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
1080c. horn, You are living proof that the two most common elements in the universRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
1079That's the trouble with you intellectuals. You've never run a business bc.horn-2/2/2002
1078I think I understand that acronym. Thank you, thank you very much. Your deep intRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News