SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Y2K damage reports
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
286 11 0
Emcee:  Gersh Avery Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
111 2000 is a leap year. In general terms the algorithm for calculating a leap yeaMighty_Mezz-12/30/1999
110 I can never remember the rules for determining when a year that's divisibleRogerWillco-12/30/1999
109 Glad to hear it coug .. have a happy new year and chat with ya sometime the neGersh Avery-12/30/1999
108 Hi Gersh, Just Checked....Our 500 bills are back in the fold.in our billfoldcoug-12/30/1999
107 <b>Western U.S. power plants to cut output on Dec 31</b> LOS ANGELC.K. Houston-12/30/1999
106 CK, Not a good time for this either----One of my on-line brokers systems just Paxb2u-12/30/1999
105 <i>Not a good time for this. Hope it gets resolved.</i> <b>C.K. Houston-12/30/1999
104 2000 is not a leap year because of the divide by 400Gersh Avery-12/30/1999
103 Well .... There are some systems that will shut down if regular maintenance hGersh Avery-12/30/1999
102 Cruiser, you say: <i>"In embedded systems (which I have been involvBill J. Landis-12/30/1999
101 Hello Ted, How are you? I bet that Harley is compliant. Here in Eastern Pa. Runner-12/30/1999
100 Checkin in and I see I can get a ""GRUB"" First ever....andcoug-12/29/1999
99 It could possibly be y3k compliant!UDanWright-12/29/1999
98 The only problem: 2000 is a leap year (divisable by 400).LaVerne E. Olney-12/29/1999
97 OS/2 on a 386? Is it a PS/2? I have a couple of those decomposing in my basemeCatLady-12/29/1999
96 I thought you might find this amusing I have a dedicated telephony applicationAJ Berger-12/29/1999
95 1972, which supposedly is a work-around setting for non-y2k compliant VCRs ( I CatLady-12/29/1999
94 I am not sure of this, but someone told me that it was reported on the news thaAmericanVoter-12/29/1999
93 Two "standard" Reuters articles: Finns Hoard Iodine Fearing Russian Elsewhere-12/29/1999
92 Y2K Programming Trivia Question: which recent year is structured exactly like AJ Berger-12/29/1999
91 Yo, Cheryl! Long time no type. Just thought I'd drop in here with a pre-YTEDennis-12/29/1999
90 Christine - I wrote a reponse to this and then it disappeared ...maybe Y2K relCruiser-12/29/1999
89 CR, You are right about name change, now that you mention it. Maybe that'coug-12/29/1999
88 Christine, Nice post, thanks. This is from Datamation magazine -- the articledclapp-12/29/1999
87 Hope they come through for you, coug. I would get the name of everyone you spokConstant Reader-12/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News