SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11123 <<At $11.875, APM is up 428% in just three years>> Wow - always somBald Man from Mars-12/23/1997
11122 Take a look at the NASDAQ sites business news. It's a copyrighted article sDon Earl-12/23/1997
11121 <<At $11.875, APM is up 428% in just three years>> Wow - always somGreg R-12/23/1997
11120 Look at the bright side: At $11.875, APM is up 428% in just three years from aappro-12/23/1997
11119 A little info from FSI earnings Commenting on current industry conditions, JoeFrank Povoski-12/22/1997
11118 Let's hope that APM keeps dropping. That way, the shorts can make some monLK2-12/22/1997
11117 I think it held up rather well considering the market was up <G>Mark Adams-12/22/1997
11116 SEGT Bowl-12/22/1997
11115 When is the last time this dude close up ??? A couple of months ago ???Bald Man from Mars-12/22/1997
11114 Sorry, I missed something in this exchange Todd. Who is the "she" whDave Chanoux-12/22/1997
11113 Hi Todd, Have you or anyone else noticed or wondered about the strange spreadsDon Earl-12/22/1997
11112 Lawrence - I felt the same and asked again. The gal said they were in fact quT Bowl-12/22/1997
11111 Brian, I agree that Vinik contributed to both the rise and fall to some extent.Brian Lempel-12/21/1997
11110 In just a little over a year, APM ran up from 15 to 60, and then back down to 1Brian Moore-12/21/1997
11109 Jon, <<The longs on the thread are unusually tolerant(for SI) of the shorBrian Lempel-12/21/1997
11108 <i>i'm a bit confused at present, because of two different sets of opJonathan Bird-12/21/1997
11107 Hi Fermin, First, I highly recommend reading recent SEC filings. Most companieDon Earl-12/21/1997
11106 Fermin, if you have read the last few posts on this thread, you will have a gooBrian Lempel-12/21/1997
11105 Jonathan (and all): I'm following this thread, in order to decide wether ofermin marco marcos-12/21/1997
11104 Mark, Thanks, it helps to understand the differences and the similarities. BesStitch-12/21/1997
11103 IBM themselves mentioned that GMR head mfg requires the same equip as MR- the GMark Adams-12/20/1997
11102 I concur on Depreciation being ~ 10million per Qtr, but it seems you've lefMark Adams-12/20/1997
11101 Mark, perhaps I could be of some help here. Cash flow at APM is DECIDEDLY NEGAFrodo Baxter-12/20/1997
11100 Isn't a bit late for SEG to still be qualing a 2.1 head supplier? As for AFrodo Baxter-12/20/1997
11099 Mark; re: transition from TFI to MR you wrote: <One of the links Don posted Stitch-12/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News