SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2489 10 0 PRFM
Emcee:  Rande Is Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1114 I think Anthony may have seen drying volume in the afternoon on Friday and shorMammon-1/30/1999
1113 The PRFM thread is the #1 SI Hot thread. It's PRFM's time to shine. LetRock_nj-1/30/1999
1112 Cool Profile, Viper. . . .for an AP planted short. Member 3677949 Be sure to rRande Is-1/30/1999
1111 First, I would like to say if you are investing in this stock then talking abouRalph Cosenza-1/30/1999
1110 Thanks, I know I won't lose money. As for halting, it was in reference to lProvocateur-1/30/1999
1109 CFO's resigning do not cause stocks to tanks. It depends on the reason theRich Benjamin-1/30/1999
1108 Women I've spoken to say that they know what brand of perfume they like andRock_nj-1/30/1999
1107 Well I am not sure if Anthony is thinking PRFM is going to be halted ..havent ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9-1/30/1999
1106 Ralph, Sorry, you are wrong -- Perfumania carries current, quality named perfumMaryann M-1/30/1999
1105 Plus the women reporters on CNBC will be cracking cute jokes about how "niMark[ox5]-1/30/1999
1104 Anthony was right on the head about TRBD, that I know. And I give credit where Provocateur-1/30/1999
1103 Hi Ralph ..<i>"The new scents are always marketed to the department justaninvestor-1/30/1999
1102 Thanks Mark. MUST READ PRFM ARTICLE: : : forbes.com Rande Is Rande Is-1/30/1999
1101 Exactly. If Anthony@Pacific was co certain that the stock wasn't going to gProvocateur-1/30/1999
1100 Good point Rande, I never thought of this: <i>Soon they will have a new Mark[ox5]-1/30/1999
1099 Lee, Thanks, TickerHound-1/30/1999
1098 Not comparing Stocks...you missed the pointViperChick Secret Agent 006.9-1/30/1999
1097 HERE IS A GREAT FORBES ARTICLE! A MUST READ ABOUT PRFM AND THE FAMILY STRUGGLESMark[ox5]-1/30/1999
1096 01/29/1999 15:59:59 10.8125 200 Best bid nasd 01/29/1999 15:59:59 11 1300 BestLee Walsh-1/30/1999
1095 Opening an internet site will definitely boost sales. But here is what has me iProvocateur-1/30/1999
1094 PRFM - Has anyone considered that they may have bigger and better things planneWilliam G. Murray-1/30/1999
1093 <i>"given the blessing of Alan Greenspan,"</i> I think GTheLineMan-1/30/1999
1092 Maryann, the bottom line is no one on this thread (unless they are a PRFM emploMark[ox5]-1/30/1999
1091 Gorcon, I do not own nor short positions in this security. I am a spectator inRalph Cosenza-1/30/1999
1090 bbruin, good post... I remember you from JAWS thread way back when I used to pMark[ox5]-1/30/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News