SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1118Rick is right here - I was thinking like a bond analyst not a biotech analyst. &Biomaven-4/16/2002
1117>> has a bunch of busted converts << One, due 2007. But Peter'scaram(o)uche-4/16/2002
1116Thank you John. dAKLLCF-4/16/2002
1115Hmmm, interesting. DAKLLCF-4/16/2002
1114Following Peter's post, Viropharma had $240mm cash at 12/31/01, and $180mm iJohn Metcalf-4/16/2002
1113DAK, Like SEPR, VPHM has a bunch of busted converts hanging over their head. SoBiomaven-4/16/2002
1112Is it really possible they have over $10shr in cash???? DAKLLCF-4/16/2002
1111Hi DAK, fwiw...Here is another site, that give similar info...some of it is updSnowShredder-4/15/2002
1110There was no problem getting my 12 handle today, so I bought a little TLRK in thMichael Bakunin-4/15/2002
1109Thanks Ricksmh-4/15/2002
1108I'd say that abstract-based SPIN is already in every stock where there is a scaram(o)uche-4/15/2002
1107Rick, Can we assume that all of the ASCO abstracts that are going to be availabsmh-4/15/2002
1106Because we're: 1. cheap, and 2. honest. Mostly cheap.scaram(o)uche-4/15/2002
1105Today I may (knock on wood) be able to buy TLRK with a $12 handle, which makes mMichael Bakunin-4/15/2002
1104this chart link won't be worth looking at beyond tonight....... quote.yahooscaram(o)uche-4/14/2002
1103Here's what I said I was going to do for VPHM....... <i>Don't knoscaram(o)uche-4/14/2002
1102OK, updates made to "2001" (shown below) and "2000". Pausinscaram(o)uche-4/14/2002
1101I'm going to get around to portfolio updates this weekend. Anything (!) to scaram(o)uche-4/13/2002
1100But then you could not sell as many high priced memberships.... geomopgcw-4/12/2002
1099Green screen, lotsa issues up better than 5%. But I'm disgusted with it allscaram(o)uche-4/12/2002
1098when TSC went with this stance last year, it marked a clear transition, IMO, forscaram(o)uche-4/12/2002
1097Would not this be a sensible solution ? <i>To avoid any problems with selnigel bates-4/12/2002
1096This is disgusting....... ASCO...... thestreetdotcom is objectively reportiscaram(o)uche-4/12/2002
1095John, <<Miljenko, if you're switching from short positions, it tells Miljenko Zuanic-4/10/2002
1094Joining you on CRGN and TLRK. Thanks for heads up. DAKLLCF-4/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):