SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
No to WTO! Seattle 1999
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
187 6 0
Emcee:  Opioi Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
112 <i>If they really wanted something done about their "causes&quoThe Philosopher-12/2/1999
111 This demonstration shows the citizens of the world that the American people arekingfish-12/2/1999
110 << <i>Why was it a big success? ... If you think the vandals weren&Machaon-12/2/1999
109 But aren't these protestors speaking out against pollution, child labor, etNull Dog Ago-12/2/1999
108 Hey, Reboot Barry, you missed Mr. Emery's intent. He was saying that Jesus&Null Dog Ago-12/2/1999
107 << <i> ... when the government suspends the rights of 30,000 one daMachaon-12/2/1999
106 << <i>You are off topic bro. People of all faiths have questions abMachaon-12/2/1999
105 <i>The job of the police is to protect him from the tiny minority who wouNull Dog Ago-12/2/1999
104 I wasn't intending that to mean they had a time allotment, but I can see hoNull Dog Ago-12/2/1999
103 The cops should have given them all party hats, blow sticks, and rattlers and sBill-12/2/1999
102 Hey, Chris, I agree that the WTO is worth protesting, but the reports I read weNull Dog Ago-12/2/1999
101 Unions don't like the internet or any technological progress. Bill-12/2/1999
100 big point against the wto the point that they have the power to supercede fedeNate-12/2/1999
99 Seems to me that most of the demonstrators have a case of "protest envy.&qBill-12/2/1999
98 legal protest in the time of the boston tea partiers actually it was seen as aNate-12/2/1999
97 >>The protest was a big success, in spite of the vandalism. Now people aRobert J-12/2/1999
96 <<<Even if there were "few people who resorted to vandalism"JBTFD-12/2/1999
95 <<<Clinton supposedly even had plans to meet with the protestors, butJBTFD-12/2/1999
94 Even if there were "few people who resorted to vandalism" ONE was oneKLP-12/2/1999
93 There were very few people who resorted to vandalism. To be fair to the policeJBTFD-12/2/1999
92 I'm not saying that you should prevent these demonstrations. But allow themEric Mason-12/2/1999
91 <i>When people use there bodies to block an entrance to an event, they arThe Philosopher-12/2/1999
90 Yes people do have a right to express their own opinions. But it does not give Eric Mason-12/1/1999
89 <i>By the way, why did you choose the name of an anti-authoritarian rockeKid Rock-12/1/1999
88 Barryman, You are off topic bro. People of all faiths have questions about theKid Rock-12/1/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):